So we’re back to “she’s crazy.” I guess that’s a positive step forward from “she’s a demon.”
Notice what this tweet does. It identifies two claims made by @RealCandaceO. It doesn’t refute them. It doesn’t call them inaccurate. It just states them. The people who hate her will read into them that they’re bad claims.
Then it explains that Candace making these unchallenged claims is evidence that she’s crazy. It even goes so far as to provide a specific diagnosis and lays out the elements or factors of the diagnosis. But it doesn’t actually do the analysis. That’s for the reader predisposed to dislike Candace to fill in the blanks in their heads.
This is standard. It happens to her. It happens to me. It happens to anyone who challenges the neocon fed slop narrative on just about any subject.
They’ll call you a liar or a grifter, but they don’t actually identify any lies. They just disagree with the conclusions. They don’t actually identify any misstatements or lies. They just view the same common facts and reach a different conclusion.
Here is the problem, gubment schooling has 1. Taught how to take a test, not critical thinking
2. "Authorities" means "experts" always trust what they say.
3. "Trust the science"
research, observation and critical thinking, dedication = investigators
Anyone can do
I'm told the opening statement from last night is a really fine summation of many of the documented issues with the case against Tyler Robinson. Starts around 5:17.
Figured I'd share it here since I'm taking the night off and will do a show tomorrow.
https://t.co/1ie6ZykKyR
Both sides are fighting about USAID but they are all missing the real issue. I had a great conversation with Emerald Robinson on her news show yesterday about this. Let's follow the money...
DOGE hired a bunch of young kids who looked for "memes", key words to grab to show the ridiculousness. Then, overnight, they cut 89% of programs, like a light switch. That wasn't the answer. The numbers of kids killed narrative that is being used isn't the answer either, because again, it's not accurate and the truth of corruption inside USAID is bigger and is lost in the performative political narrative.
I analyzed the 600 biggest USAID contracts:
- 1 company, Chemonics, held 25% of USAID's contract value
- The top 5 firms held 56% of USAID's contract value
- ~30% of the money went to firms that have faced federal fraud settlements
- A USAID contracting officer just pleaded guilty in a $550 MILLION bribery scheme. Bribes laundered through a shell-company subcontractor. Four guilty pleas. This is documented, in DOJ filings. He just changed the name of his company and kept competing and winning contracts
- In Ukraine, USAID spending went from $0.25B/yr to $16.4B at peak. Of ~$36.5B, $22.9B was CASH wired to a foreign government through a World Bank fund, with oversight outsourced to a contractor. And 89% of the itemized awards name NO recipient. You literally cannot see who got the money.
- The agency's own watchdog admits it can't even list all its sub-grantees. You can't screen who you can't see....
Here's the part both sides miss:
The answer was never "burn it down overnight" OR "never question it." It was a scalpel approach.
What I would recommend for a real DOGE assessment:
1. AUDIT it: Open the books. Look at every masked recipient, every sub-grant, public.
2. PROSECUTE the fraud: The $550M scheme should be the start, not the end and that company and leadership should be banned from bidding on contracts again
3. END the no-bid concentration: Break the Beltway oligopoly that has existed for decades
4. KEEP what works. HIV drugs, TB, food, disaster relief. That is what USAID exists to do.
DOGE used a light switch where they needed to use a dial, because, now the fraud investigations are frozen as well and our politicians are using incorrect data points to fight one another while the real problem still exists.
This should just be general knowledge people have by going to school, but no, our gubment schoolin is industrial babysittin to send out brain dead drones en masse🤡🤮
.@ray_ban and @oakley you have truly betrayed your customers, and all of humanity really.
You think it’s ok to manufacture glasses that can casually film people who are giving zero consent nor have any knowledge that filming is taking place?
In my 25 years as a health professional I rarely saw any of these issues until COVID
Lipedema (despite being certified in lymphatic drainage)
Parathyroid issues
MCAS
Severe hair loss in women
Severe anemia/low ferritin
Persistent insomnia
Now I see frequently
👑Is it really just coincidence? Tech elites, billionaires, prime ministers, and Miss Arizona 2012 living in or being around the world’s most surveilled AI-camera cities... all overlapping in the exact same locations and deal flows tied to Epstein.
✉️ March 2012: Epstein to Osborne: “kwok . ? what does this do hedosophia?” Osborne to Epstein, where Epstein replies distinguishing “Ours are Kuoks not Kwoks.”.
🇲🇴Wynn Resorts, Limited Feb 27, 2013? "Hann Reserve is preparing for its highly anticipated grand opening, with the impressive golf-centered lifestyle resort"
🇨🇳Erika Frantzve checked in at Mutianyu Great Wall (Beijing) on August 5, 2013.
During the same timeframe?
🇲🇴Wynn Resorts/Macau developments
🇨🇳Erika Frantzveher boyfriend JORTS playing for Chongqing Flying Dragons CBA basketball season with American players (2014).
🇨🇳Meanwhile, the Epstein-Osborne network was actively working Asia money circles involving Kuok family, Li Ka-shing partners, and Rothschild-linked China funds.
Coincidence of geography and timing?
DID YOU KNOW Joni Ernst is trying to slip an act into the Senate Farm Bill that would negate EVERY SINGLE STATE LAW for food safety, local ag, and livestock welfare? Well now you do.
And we have to stop her.