Al principio Israel decía que las imágenes eran falsas, después que había sido Hamás, después que atacaban porque había armas, después que atacaban porque había terroristas, después que atacaban pero que había sido un error…y ahora ya ni se molestan en mentir.
Incluso sus ministros y soldados cuelgan videos fardando.
Objetivo conseguido: que ser un cabronazo desalmado mole.
Por cierto, acaban de asesinar a 250 personas en Líbano por la cara.
Malditos sean ellos y los canallas que los apoyan.
De cómo la izquierda ha pervertido el espíritu del feminismo clásico y de aquel 8-M de 2018✍️✍️✍️✍️La suplantación del feminismo https://t.co/BNQoDH3voF
@GaztanagaJ24367@Garenak_RadFem No rayes, la mayoría de la gente va a la manifestación sin saber que hay otra opción y sin saber ni qué van a decir. Pongo la mano en el fuego por que más de la mitad de esa gente no apoya ni de lejos la expl0tación sexu4l y reproductiva de las mujeres
@DuqueDeBomarzo@debatelibros Siguiendo tu símil, es como si hubiese escrito el prólogo el diario de Anna Frank un n4zi y diciendo que no era para tanto y que se inventa cosas. Te queda más claro así?
Primero: TERF es un insulto misógino con el que nos han estado señalando y amnazando durante años.
Segundo: ¿no logran, @iu_valladolid, @MailloAntonio, ver la invisibilización machista en lo que han hecho de desplazar y usurpar a las mujeres los puestos que les corresponden?
Tercero: Se preguntan por qué sube la derecha después de insuItar al 99% de la población que sabe que los hombres no pueden ser mujeres. Sigan así que les van a salir los votos a devolver.
«En el momento en que te niegas a participar en la mentira de que él es una mujer, queda 100% claro que es un hombre MUY espeluznante».
El momento en que @Tampax decidió pagarle para anunciar tampones es también espeluznante.
Hermano de Ayuso.
280.000€ en comisiones.
¿Quién pilla? Pablo Casado.
Novio de Ayuso.
350.000€ en comisiones.
¿Quién pilla? El Fiscal General del Estado.
El mensaje es claro: Ayuso no se toca.
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.
I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.
Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.
However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.
When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.
The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.
Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?
I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.
The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.
Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
@kimi_flow@republicmeoth@IamRGR1 Nadie ha hablado de tratar mal a nadie. Pero hay que hablar con propiedad y legislar en base a sentimientos es un sinsentido.
@LisaGponce@IamRGR1@Danieloofcourse Y por qué se supone que es del PP? Basta ya de politizarlo todo. Si alguien de vox dice que el agua moja resulta que si lo decimos los demás somos de vox? Anda ya. La biología es lo que es, seas de izquierdas, de derechas o de lo que sea.
@republicmeoth@IamRGR1 Tú confundes sexo con género. El constructo social es el género, no el sexo, que es inmutable. Hombre o mujer se NACE. Otra cosa es el género, que son los estereotipos asociados al sexo. Lo mezclais todo y encima vais dando lecciones
@NeuetesNeus@IamRGR1 Perdona pero llamar izquierda a potemos es reirse de todos los votantes de izquierdas. Y más a Belarra o a Irene Montero. La secta queer es cosa suya, no de la izquierda como quieren hacer ver.