@BrokerPuzzles It’s B, cause A can’t be true. If A did it, then A, B, and C must be telling the truth, which exceeds 2 liars. If we know A isn’t the leaker, then we can immediately tell A and C are lying as they both blame A. This means D is telling the truth, so B leaked it.
@Wayward_9@eisenhuttenstad@Eye_Eater It is illegal to invade a country for the sake of annexing territory, as listed in the UN charter, and many other treaties. In other words, there’s a thing called international law. Just cause it’s not enforced on the same level as domestic law, doesn’t make it legal.
@halalboozee Those two aren’t contradictory? Yeah, that man was horrible. It doesn’t prove how all men are like that. The reason the slogan is bad is cause it’s often brought up to dismiss 🍇, the severity of a specific crime doesn’t matter, and missing the point only makes it worse.
@fail__sandwich Yeah, I agree with you, but wdym you hope it raises to 1 in 5? If they’re Canadians, and you agree they are, why are you still separating them from other Canadians, who should be the exact same? This would actually have been a good take had it not been for the last sentence.
@xxEastheart__@vampirefiIes Comparatively, most actual colonial Empires had no historical associations to the territories they conquered. They only took over those territories for resources, which is why it makes states such as the British Empire colonial.
@xxEastheart__@vampirefiIes That isn’t actually the definition of colonization. Colonization is the practice of intentionally replacing the population or exploiting resources from a conquered foreign territory, without fully incorporating said country or giving them equal leverage as the metropole.
@antonchadekoek To be fair to them, France (A major power at the time) invading the Rhineland while Germany was still rebuilding its army is a lot more realistic than war torn Ukraine beating Russia.
@emkenobi It’s banned in name. The federal U.S. government legalized it and overturned all state bans. Most states that had it banned at the time of the legalization never bothered to unban it, since it functionally was already unbanned.
@galacticfrost@airiholiic Yeah (for 4 years), Argentina inherited them from another colonialist Empire. The British also actually arrived on the islands first and then taking it back, then they were bought by Spain from France later. If you wanna go by who got there first between the two, it was Britain.
@lanenalagut A language is meant to allow people to communicate with one another. If a language ISN’T easy to learn, then it has failed at it’s job of being the means of communication.
@godscryinvessel@hvsperus Nobody invaded a poor country. The Falklands were part of Argentina for literally 4 years. That’s less than the time of COVID to last year. Argentinians are obv descendants of Europeans (85%). And even if the majority were indigenous, the Falklands were still fully uninhabited.
@xolyviaxo@Oury838891 That’s fair, however I would assume in most scenarios, it’s brought up as an insult, the same way fat is. Although in just an actual description (such as medical) that’s fair. It depends on the context.
@SomeDrawerGirl@taemeagain I would consider appropriating a racial slur worse. Much worse than counting continents differently between two colonizing languages actually.
@Joshua4570 These are all Romance countries, and actually, even these don’t call Americans “United-Satesans.” All of them use some form of Américaine (this is in French) when referring to American people. The examples are only used referring to the country itself i.e. “American policy”.