✏️ Freelance journalist based in Birkenhead (Wirral,UK). Wirral Council and Merseyside politics are the topics I cover. Send stories to [email protected] .
@NeilWilbyMedia@MouseInTheCourt@hmcts to court security variations even within a city or local authority area or as buildings used are redesigned/remodelled. Personally I never understood why accredited journalists can't be added to the Professional Users Access Scheme - as we're a professional user too!
@NeilWilbyMedia@MouseInTheCourt Yes thanks for that @NeilWilbyMedia - court security varies a lot across England, from my experience of no searches at all on anybody attending, to judicial orders about court security and inconsistent practice across @HMCTS , the Professional Users Access Scheme fast lane...
I’m at Wallasey Town Hall in Seacombe on the Wirral (Merseyside, UK) ahead of a meeting of @WirralCouncil ‘s councillors (Council) due to start at 6.00 pm. Agenda and reports for Annual Council (Part Two) can be read on @WirralCouncil’s website here - https://t.co/dVJUUl4LtT
I’m at Wallasey Town Hall in Seacombe on the Wirral (Merseyside, UK) ahead of a meeting of @WirralCouncil ‘s councillors (Council) due to start at 6.00 pm. Agenda and reports for Annual Council (Part Two) can be read on @WirralCouncil’s website here - https://t.co/dVJUUl4LtT
Annual Meeting (Part 1) (Wirral Council) 13th May 2026 [VIDEO] outgoing Mayor Cllr Brian Kenny, incoming Mayor Cllr Mary Jordan and incoming Deputy Mayor Cllr Mike Sullivan https://t.co/JB71dNUfCY via @YouTube
or information under the open justice principle in paragraphs 21-23 and in paras 24-25, what happens if someone breaches a Tribunal order and that orders holding a hearing in private or an order just sent to parties, how that impacts reporting too of such orders and hearings.
My only case in the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) was 2019. The decision was published here in November 2019 [2019] UKUT 305 (AAC), https://t.co/JvR5iZujEP . I specifically stated (although part of the appeal was social security related) not to have anonymity.
My only case in the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) was 2019. The decision was published here in November 2019 [2019] UKUT 305 (AAC), https://t.co/JvR5iZujEP . I specifically stated (although part of the appeal was social security related) not to have anonymity.
The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) have today (24th March 2026) published their Open Justice Practice Guidance today here:- https://t.co/vQUw3djOGy
There are a number of changes (from 30/3/2026) that I will go into detail about in subsequent tweets...
or information under the open justice principle in paragraphs 21-23 and in paras 24-25, what happens if someone breaches a Tribunal order and that orders holding a hearing in private or an order just sent to parties, how that impacts reporting too of such orders and hearings.
are outlined in paragraphs 8-10 and details on how to apply for an anonymity or privacy order in paragraphs 11-17, details on public access to hearings (whether in person or video or audio) are in paragraphs 18-20 and the procedure for applying for public access do documents...
and final decisions will continue to be published online. Details of circumstances in which a party can apply to restrict specific information from the public and press (and the Tribunal's powers) are detailed in paragraphs 4-7, access to papers in the case...
the process for an appellant to go through if they wish to apply for anonymity or a different type of restriction on open justice. (as a result the UT1 form has been changed.
Listings (including party names) will continue to be published online and outside the hearing room...
Previously party names in decisions about social security and child support cases published decisions only used initials. Now the party names will be used unless a rule 14 order has been made or the Judge decides to make an order or issue directions.
The guidance sets out...