הוצאת צווי המעצר הבינלאומיים נגד מנהיגי מדינת ישראל בחשד לאחריות ולשותפות בביצוע פשעים ��ל הרעבה, רדיפה ותקיפה מכוונת של אזרחים, היא מנקודות השפל הקשות בהיסטוריה הישראלית.
למרבה הצער, מכל הידוע לנו על התנהלותה של ישראל ברצועת עזה בשנה האחרונה – שנעשתה בידיעתם ובהכוונתם של ראש ממשלת ישראל וקבינט השרים – איננו מופתעים שהראיות אכן מצביעות על כך שנתניהו וגלנט אחראים לפשעי מלחמה ולפשעים נגד האנושות.
הטלת אחריות אישית על מקבלי ההחלטות היא מרכיב חיוני במאבק להשגת צדק וחופש לכל בני האדם החיים בין הירדן והים. לפיכך, על כל המדינות החברות לכבד את החלטת בית הדין ולאכוף את הצווים.
בצלם וארגונים אחרים מתריעים כבר שנים כי משטר האפרטהייד הישראלי כרוך מעצם מהותו בהפרות חמורות של זכויות האדם, הפרות אלו התעצמו בשנה האחרונה והגיעו לממדים בלתי-נתפסים. התוצאה של מדיניותה של ממשלת ישראל היא עשרות אלפי אזרחים הרוגים, מאות אלפי מזי רעב וסבל בל ישוער של מיליוני בני אדם.
The ICC’s issuing of international arrest warrants for Israel’s leaders on the suspicion they committed the crimes of starvation, persecution, and intentionally directing an attack against civilians is one of the lowest points in Israeli history.
Unfortunately, all we know about the conduct of Israel in the Gaza Strip over the past year - which was conducted with the knowledge and the direction of the prime minister and the ministerial cabinet – it isn’t surprising that the evidence indicates that Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Gallant are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Personal accountability for decision-makers is a key element in the struggle for justice and freedom for all human beings living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Therefore, all states parties to the court must respect the Pre-Trial Chamber’s decision and enforce the warrants.
B'Tselem and other organizations have warned for years that the Israeli apartheid regime inherently involves severe human rights violations. During the past year, these violations have intensified to unimaginable dimensions. The Israeli government’s policy has resulted in tens of thousands of civilians killed, hundreds of thousands of civilians starved and the horrific suffering of millions.
Imagine Russian football fans in a foreign city:
- Interrupted a minute’s silence in memory of dead flood victims with chants in support of killing Ukrainian children
- Rampaged through the city
- Ripped down Ukrainian flags
- Chanted “death to Ukrainians”
- Attacked local residents
Imagine then, when local residents attacked them, they were presented as victims of a racist pogrom.
@abierkhatib Only way to get people to put themselves in Palestinians' shoes.
I'd add, "1st floor belonged to some of my ancestors in 70 AD," "you're racist if you try to evict me, terrorist if you harm my family. You leave me no choice but to control every aspect of your life in basement."
With the world’s eyes on Gaza, extreme Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank are forcing Palestinians off their land.
My latest for @dwnews
https://t.co/NFTJhQTtfB
Sound familiar? In 1904, native Namibians, who had been expropriated by German colonizers for a couple of decades, killed 100 German settlers in an attempt to liberate their land. The German colonizers responded with the genocide of native peoples:
https://t.co/pBte9nn5mf
I now know a lot more about journalism, people and my chosen home, Germany, thanks to this.
It’s a story that I wish more people in Germany and the west engaged with – so, enjoy!
https://t.co/KEMz2jBpFg
Research has shown that the larger the # of victims in a context, the more people see them as just numbers, rather than humans. Hopefully this video will help remind people that, even if you kill many thousands of Palestinians, every one of them is human:
https://t.co/A35XnF4Lmj
Condemning Hamas' attacks of October 7th as a STARTING point for a conversation, has the subconcious/unconcious effect, in human psychology, of reinforcing the Israeli narrative that whatever had been done to Palestinians before October 7th 2023 was not on that same scale.
Hamas' attacks of October 7th should be condemned only AFTER:
1. condemning the fact that Palestinians have been ethnic cleansed from their land/homes in order to ensure that a peoples persecuted by Europeans would have a country of a "Jewish nature" to seek refuge in; and...
2. conceding that, given asymmetric military capacities, it can only to be expected that many survivors of this ethnic cleansing will see terrorism against the civilians who have taken their land/homes as their only (seemingly) realisitic option for dissuading that injustice.
To the "geniuses" suggesting Palestinians should be "absorbed" by "other Arab" countries: Who cares whether Palestinians are "Arab" or not. The point is that they are natives of their land, such that having to leave it, because they are not Jewish, has torn their souls right out.
@benshapiro What about the thousands who have been newly radicalized by (yet another) Zionist injustice? How will you identify them when they grow up to form their own resistance movement (which will again resort to terrorism, because it is no match for the Israeli army)? Kill all Arabs, no?
@benshapiro What about the thousands who have been newly radicalized by (yet another) Zionist injustice? How will you identify them when they grow up to form their own liberation movement that might not be announced as "Hamas"? When you talk too fast, you don't give yourself time to think.
Yes, the attacks of October 7th appear to have involved a brutality beyond mere resistance, but the Israeli response has shown a belief that killing thousands of innocents in the process is not as dangerous to Israelis as allowing all natives to live as equals on the entire land.
This appears to be the most popular Israeli narrative:
Israelis aren't in danger because they've committed ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and persecution of Palestinians, thus radicalizing many of them. Israelis are in danger because they haven't killed enough of those who resist.