@BernieFratto Pretty-sure you know “Sexual Assault” is a term unto itself & can stand alone in law. As all sexual assault is violent, to say a specific example is an example is a redundancy.
Sue Robinson screwed Watson when she said his actions were non-violent.
@BernieFratto You possibly already have seen this, bur it shows how bad Stafford was in the 2 playoff games before the Super Bowl. Listen to the unbiased announcer’s view of Matthew’s performances.
49ers Jaquiski Tartt DROPS EASY INTERCEPTION https://t.co/G1hqLOSHoR via @YouTube
@EphraimSalaam Sue Robinson screwed Watson by saying his sexual assault was non-violent. “Sexual abuse” is a term by itself; violence is legally always assumed a part of “sexual abuse” whether stated or not.
The 2 words are enough & always assume violence.
He’ll get 10 at least.
@PlankShow “Sexual Assault” is an all-encompassing term—meaning “violent sexual assault.”
Sue Robinson killed Watson when she said that he was not guilty of “violent sexual assault.”
All sexual assault is violent.
@cannonhartman JimmyG deprived of 2nd Super Bowl game in 3 years cuz a 49er
DB can’t pick a horrible Stafford pass.
49ers Jaquiski Tartt DROPS EASY INTERCEPTION https://t.co/G1hqLOSHoR via @YouTube
@benmaller Like zillions of Rams’ fans, you judged Stafford with your heart not your mind during most of playoffs….Listen to this unbiased call of Stafford in game before Super Bowl.
49ers’ Jaquiski Tartt drops easy interception https://t.co/gj9xTdx9e7 via @YouTube
@benmaller Ben, whether you agree or not, you can understand the original decision and why it upset so many.
Sue Robinson said Watson’s actions were “non-violent”
which many objected to because they say ALL sexual assault is violent from the git-go.