@Greeney17595412@Breid508@Heccles94@StateDept How bout the Kinks’ Living on a Thin Line:
All those wars that were won and lost don’t seem to matter very much any more. There’s no England now.
Written 45 years ago already, by John, not Ray. .
@Kandi8907@JenelleComedy@kyledcheney It’s not a power. The court can’t “strike down” anything. If you metaphorically strike down an abstraction, what does that even mean? No, the court states opinions and issues orders that the executive may or may not choose to follow or enforce.
Sauer didn’t say that, and immunity is clear as a matter of law. If the Constitution is the supreme law, no putative law can prohibit or punish the President from doing what the Constitution requires of him.
@kyledcheney that's like sauer telling the supreme court at argument in the immunity case the president could send seal team 6 to kill political rivals and nothing could be done about it. The supreme court made up a blanket immunity doctrine anyway.
@bu95718349@kyledcheney Sauer didn’t say that, and immunity is clear as a matter of law. If the Constitution is the supreme law, no putative law can prohibit or punish the President from doing what the Constitution requires of him.
@Kandi8907@JenelleComedy@kyledcheney No, that’s wrong. In Marbury, the court held that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It did not give any power or confirm any power. In fact, judicial review *isn’t* a power.
@JenelleComedy@Kandi8907@kyledcheney No, there is no law that says that. And the branches aren’t supposed to be equal; Congress is supposed to be pre-eminent.
YES—the government can make changes to government property and the only thing you can do is vote them out if you don’t like it.
This includes—removing statues of confederate soldiers, founding fathers, selling off the wall on the southern border, and ALSO remodeling the White House to add a ballroom.