lgstarr

Former entertainment industry professional turned conservative political activist. NO DMs.

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

One of Donald Trump's greatest acheivements is the liberation of Marco Rubio!

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

AI query [7/11/2026]

Is there any political figure currently alive and active in the U.S. government who has the answer to reducing our national debt?

AI answer:

Yes, multiple active political figures have proposed concrete answers to reducing the national debt, though executing these solutions requires overcoming steep political obstacles. The core economic remedy involves a combination of significant spending reductions, entitlement reforms, and revenue increases.

Bipartisan Targets and Committees

Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA): He serves as the vice chair of the House Budget Committee and is leading a push to cap the federal deficit at 3% or less of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2036. The 3% threshold is widely cited by experts as the key level necessary to stabilize the national debt.

Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) & Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA): They have introduced and co-sponsored legislation in the Senate to formally establish this 3% deficit-to-GDP target to force a sustainable, long-term fiscal path.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA): A long-time proponent of bipartisanship regarding the deficit, he previously worked to eliminate trillions from the debt through the foundational "Gang of Six" framework, which prioritized joint tax and entitlement reform.

Treasury Leadership

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Working directly with the President, he has publicly embraced the 3% deficit-to-GDP target as a way to get America's fiscal house in order and bring down inflation.

The Core Political Challenge

Economists and the Congressional Budget Office project that the U.S. deficit will exceed $2 trillion in 2026, driven largely by mandatory interest payments, Medicare, and Social Security. Any effective plan to reduce the debt requires difficult compromises that consistently divide Congress:

Spending Cuts: Entitlement programs (Social Security and Medicare) and defense make up the largest pieces of the federal budget. Shrinking the debt significantly would require unpopular cuts or structural reforms to these massive programs.

Tax Increases: Raising revenues requires bipartisan courage, as politicians generally face pushback from voters and donors for raising the tax burden.

While the exact mathematics of reducing the national debt are universally known by these government figures, the political will to implement them remains the primary hurdle. [1, 2]

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@LangmanVince 10+++++++++

[Grace Gym🏋️‍♀️ @GraceGym_]

This is a woodworking trick my grandpa never taught anyone 👍

[Overton @overton_news]

Bill O’Reilly drags Chris Cuomo out of his bubble and forces him to confront the Democrats’ communism problem.

Cuomo tried to bury his head in the sand, insisting Trump only labels people like Mamdani communists because they “want change.”

O’Reilly refused to let this one slide.

O’REILLY: “The communism thing is rapidly obscuring the spending habits of Americans. The communist thing is very detrimental to the Democratic Party.”

CUOMO: “What is the communist thing?”

O’REILLY: “Hello, are you on the planet Earth?!”

“Mamdani?”

CUOMO: “Yeah, but just…just…just because Trump calls people who want change ‘communist’ doesn’t mean that it’s resonating.”

O’REILLY: “Okay. If you study the man, he’s a communist. So is his father.”

“He wants to control the means of production in New York City.”

“He’s going to use regulations to get landlords out of business.”

“He’s going to try to control the food flow into the city.”

“So you can sit there and say I don’t believe it. People believe what they want to believe.”

“Man’s a hardcore communist!”

“And so are the two others who were elected into…”

CUOMO: “Listen, my brother ran against him, right, and lost twice. The policies he’s put in place are barely socialistic…let alone not communistic.”

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

REPORT: Los Angeles Unified School District Facing Financial Insolvency, Could Run Out of Money in a Year https://t.co/rKsnahaHo9 #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

WATCH: Investigation Exposes NIH Quietly Continuing Fauci-Era Kitten Experiments Despite Broken Promises to Phase Them Out https://t.co/1CXihkwweG #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

Whaddya wanna bet that this "Quantum, New Earth One" movement is a communist front (CCP/CPC)??

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

What Is The "Unforgivable Sin? - NIV
https://t.co/B3AQudypm9

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@FactsNotFuckery @DataRepublican @RealCandaceO @AndrewKolvet So is she the female Alex Jones now?

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

I read "The Fountainhead" when I was fiftenn and "Atlas Shrugged" FOUR times in the 1960's!

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@MahikRani50377 Still?!?

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

Oh, wow--would you do this?!?
https://t.co/x3VUNKH7iy

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

The role of the conservative elite in the Nazi rise to power

The conservative elite were the old ruling class and new business class in Weimar Germany. Throughout the 1920s they became increasingly frustrated with the Weimar Republic’s continuing economic and political instability, their lack of real power and the rise of communism. They believed that a return to authoritarian rule was the only stable future for Germany which would protect their power and money.

The first move towards this desired authoritarian rule was Hindenburg’s increasing use of Article 48 . Between 1925-1931 Article 48 was used a total of 16 times. In 1931 alone this rose to 42 uses, in comparison to only 35 Reichstag laws being passed in the same year. In 1932, Article 48 was used 58 times.

The conservative elite’s second move towards authoritarian rule was helping the Nazi Party to gain power. The conservative elite and the Nazi Party had a common enemy – the political left .

As Hitler controlled the masses support for the political right, the conservative elite believed that they could use Hitler and his popular support to ‘democratically’ take power. Once in power, Hitler could destroy the political left. Destroying the political left would help to remove the majority of political opponents to the ring-wing conservative elite.

Once Hitler had removed the left-wing socialist opposition and destroyed the Weimar Republic, the conservative elite thought they would be able to replace Hitler, and appoint a leader of their choice.

As Hitler’s votes dwindled in the November 1932 elections, the conservative elite knew that if they wanted to use Hitler and the Nazis to destroy the political left, they had to act quickly to get Hitler appointed as chancellor.

Von Papen and Oskar von Hindenburg (President Hindenburg’s son) met secretly and backed Hitler to become chancellor. A group of important industrialists, including Hjalmar Schacht and Gustav Krupp, also wrote outlining their support of Hitler to President Hindenburg.

The support of these figures was vital in Hindenburg’s decision to appoint Hitler as chancellor. Once elected, the conservative elite soon realised that they had miscalculated Hitler and his intentions.
https://t.co/rgnw8TULvk

[QUANTUM GUARD ™️ @QuantumGuard17]

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Nick Shirley and David walked into a Somali "transportation company" in Minneapolis, which gets MILLIONS from the state, and the Somali man ERUPTS inside

It just so happens this "transportation" company is located at a MONEY WIRING BUSINESS!

These transportation companies are central to the whole scheme

"THERE'S NO! We DON'T KNOW! Don't record!"

NICK: "This is fraud. This is supposed to be Safari Transportation!"

DAVID: "Safari Transportation, State of Minnesota. *Holding papers* It's registered here NOW!"

There is fraud going on that the state has NOT found out about.

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

TERRIFYING: Far-Left Democratic Socialists Unveil Radical Plan to Abolish the Senate, Replace the President and Supreme Court, Grant Mass Amnesty, and Overthrow the U.S. Constitution
https://t.co/caODltMa5D

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@Anna1536wj Still? I NEVER supported her, she has no idea what's she's talking about.

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

The Democrat Party's History of Race-Based Policies: From Slavery to the KKK to DEI https://t.co/hP74kQHhmD #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@DavidJHarrisJr Oh, shut up, you old bag.

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

HEROES: Young Men Break Down Doors of Burning House in Wisconsin and Save Lives of Everyone Inside, Including an Elderly Couple (VIDEO) https://t.co/vudJGPIbx9 #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

[lgstarr @lgstarr]

@mattvanswol THIS IS SO AWESOME!!!