Liberty Word

Defending Liberty: essential insights on wealth creation, freedom and politics.

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

@YvonneTazzer527 @realBrandonGill @SenatorBanks Your stupidity is showing

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenatorBanks

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@realBrandonGill

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Congress should pass a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions.

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

Don't you agree?
@IngrahamAngle

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@LeaderJohnThune

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenSusanCollins

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenEricSchmitt

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenRonJohnson

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenLummis

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenRandPaul

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

@SenEricSchmitt

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

@tedcruz

Have you considered passing a law to make the Senate a 60 vote threshold, but with existing exemptions?

This would prevent either side from nuking the filibuster.

It would take a Senate rule and change it to a law. Surely some Democrats would see the benefits of this.

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Freedom Creates Wealth

The more freedom a society possesses to enter a marketplace to earn income, the more wealth that will be created.

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Newsflash:

If the word “socialism” is being used (e.g. democratic socialism), then it means actual socialism, not social programs or government spending.

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Time Poll - what time do you want?

The U.S. is considering eliminating switching between Daylight Savings time and Standard time.

Liberty Word believes most people just want to end the switching.

Numbers 3 and 4 are for those who only want one specific time or they prefer the status quo.

1. Status Quo - Spring forward, Fall back
2. DST or Standard Time - just not Status Quo
3. DST only - Otherwise, Status Quo
4. Standard Time only - Otherwise, Status Quo

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Many claim that wealth is distributed unequally, and push for higher taxation and redistribution.

But anybody can create wealth without taking it from someone else in free market capitalism.

Do you believe that most people can create wealth without taking it from someone else?

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

This statement is the reason why government budgets are bloated and there's massive debt. It simply doesn't work.

Gov. investment on the demand side is supposed to equal supply output, which is supposed to have a proportional amount of employment.

#supplyside #economics

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Supply-side economics essentially gives workers and businesses the freedom to pursue income, which leads to new wealth creation.

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

What if I told you there's a better way to increase tax revenue than raising taxes?

The answer is economic growth will allow tax revenues to increase naturally. That's one of the central ideas behind supply-side economics.

Do you think supply-side economics works, or not? Why?

[Liberty Word @LibertyWordcom]

Wealth is the saved monetary value from meeting demand.

This definition only works in capitalism.

The idea is simple, once demand is met in a marketplace, you’ll earn an income. Saving a portion of that income is new wealth that never existed before.

Create your own wealth!