michael madsen

I'm on a bus on a psychedelic trip, reading murder books trying to stay hip.

[Jonatan Pallesen @jonatanpallesen]

A common sentiment I see regarding the female victims of mass immigration is that we shouldn't feel sorry for them because they voted for this.

I strongly disagree with this sentiment.

It's important to keep in mind that Western societies are extremely propangadised. Essentially all the major media do not describe the situation with Muslim / African mass immigration. In fact they exert effort to obscure it, and in shaming the people who do accurately describe it.

Thus, the media is the true enemy. The optimum is not a population in which everyone is doing their own research. Most people are not suited for this. This leads to Candace Owens'es. The optimum is a world where the media actually informs the population. Since the media is a failure, it comes to us to work on the challenge of informing the population.

[mert @mert]

mass surveillance is coming

> first 5 votes fail
> have another vote
> invoke technicality to require majority to vote AGAINST rather than requiring majority to vote FOR
> do it when everyone's on vacation so not enough numbers to vote against

demonic creatures

[Philippe Lemoine @phl43]

He's full of shit as usual. He is clearly not prepared to support a full resumption of the war, because he doesn't want to cause a global economic meltdown, but he also can't make a deal with Iran because a deal the Iranians isn't a deal the US could accept.

So instead I think we're just going to have months if not years of this bullshit, endless negotiations punctuated by the occasional bombing, without ever reaching a conclusive outcome. It will presumably result in elevated oil prices, relative to a counterfactual where Trump never started this stupid shit in the first place, for a long time.

And this didn't happen for any deep reasons of the sort geopolitics-pilled people like to talk about, but simply because Trump is a moron who thought he could get a quick win by killing Iran's leadership and never gave any thought to what he would do if their replacement didn't magically agree to do as he said.

[@levelsio @levelsio]

🇪🇺 The EU is now for the 6th time trying to force Chat Control through which lets them scan ALL your private messages, photos and emails without a warrant

Implictly showing the EU is not democratic and not about what the people of Europe want, because once a law is rejected, you just re-submit it until nobody is watching and it's passed

November 2023: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
June 2024: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
October 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
November 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
March 2026: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
July 2026: 📝 Chat Control is back

Even the EU's own lawyers stated Chat Control is unconstitutional: "generalised message scanning is incompatible with Article 7 of the EU Charter"

You have to wonder why the EU is so adament about reading your private chats, right?

[Ronald Dodson @RonDodson]

No one likes "Death to America!" chants, but there is a cultural memory in Iran of real policies and events.

During the Iran-Iraq War, the Reagan administration “tilted” toward Saddam Hussein because Washington wanted to prevent an Iranian victory after 1979. That support included restored diplomatic relations, commercial openings, efforts to cut off arms flows to Iran, and intelligence cooperation with Baghdad. Declassified records show U.S. officials knew by 1983–84 that Iraq was using chemical weapons, but did not let that halt the broader pro-Iraq policy.

The most damning charge is not that the CIA directly supplied Saddam with chemical weapons, but that U.S. intelligence provided Iraq with satellite imagery, maps, and tactical intelligence while knowing Iraq was likely to use mustard gas and nerve agents such as sarin in major 1988 offensives against Iranian forces. Foreign Policy reported from declassified CIA material that this intelligence helped Iraq blunt Iranian advances and bring the war toward a conclusion favorable to Baghdad.

Iraq also used chemical weapons against civilians, most notoriously at Sardasht, Iran, in June 1987, where mustard gas killed roughly 130 people and injured thousands, and at Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan in March 1988. The broader U.S. posture was a cold realpolitik calculation: condemn chemical weapons rhetorically, avoid naming Iraq too sharply at the U.N., and continue treating Saddam as the necessary counterweight to revolutionary Iran.

Were these necessary moves? They weren't moral. And they had lasting consequences.

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

This is properly insane: quite literally the worst example of censorship I've ever heard of anywhere.

I checked the actual ruling (which you can see here: https://t.co/dBKFWZ2ZWm) and, to be clear, it isn't just censorship in the conventional sense - blocking access to a website or removing content from platforms - this is the criminalization of information relayed by private citizens, with prison sentences attached.

And the most insane aspect if that it does NOT matter if the information relayed is accurate or not. It just matters that it originates from RT or other media outlets banned in the EU.

In other words, truth isn't a defense anymore in the EU, it literally doesn't matter. It's purely based on the identity of the speaker.

The ruling is actually explicit about this: the regulation, quoted by the Court says that the prohibition applies to "any content," and they draw no distinction based on what the content actually says. If it originates from banned outlets, it's banned.

It is, quite simply, a complete unraveling of the entire post-Enlightenment legal and philosophical project where entire generations of Europeans fought to move from "who says it" to "is it true" as the operative question.

Think about the absurdity of it: if RT publishes a video saying the sky is blue and you share it on a publicly accessible website in the EU, you'd fall within the scope of this ruling, making you liable to criminal prosecution.

Completely and utterly absurd. But that's the EU today for you 🤷

[Adam Wren @aswren]

The problem with these schemes is that they can sort of be sold to the public with extreme restrictions without the realisation that our monster NGO sector will work day and night to expand them beyond all reason.

Direct victims of conflict will become anyone indirectly impacted by displacement, will become ‘climate refugees’ and so on. If you look at the stuff that’s published by these charities & coming out of the UN, they have long been laying the groundwork. Give them an inch and they will lawfare it to infinity

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

DEATH.
DEATH.
DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.DEATH.

[Sam Tripoli @samtripoli]

W. Kamau Bell is a garbage comic and a grifter! His special was literally called “Private School Negro” which means he cosplaying an oppressed liberator! Rich kids acting like their civil rights leaders! Nate Bargatze is one if the nicest kindest comics working today. He brings his old roommates on the road to open for him and he takes care of them. So many comics forget about the people who knew them back in the day but Nate came back for his friends. So much respect for him.

[michael madsen @lillemichael]

@Thorin It was like watching an old heaton clip

[Jonatan Pallesen @jonatanpallesen]

The modern world is too complex for many people. They can understand concrete concepts such as a pile of stuff, but they have trouble understanding abstract concepts like shareholding. This is in itself okay. But the problem is when they want to use force to arrange the economy according to their childish understanding of it.

[Bugman Hegel @FedPoasting]

The Karmelo Anthony ordeal boils down to the simple fact that a non-trivial number of black people believe that they should be governed under a sovereign hood code, and any white person who is in proximity to a black person consents to be governed under hood code. This means that any interpersonal escalation, regardless of the degree of escalation, creates the grounds for the exercise of deadly force to defend one’s “manhood.”

They do not think they should be required to submit to the law of the white man. If Karmelo were being tried in a court applying “hood code” he would be completely innocent because he murdered in defense of his manhood. So it is not that they are just pretending they believe Karmelo is actually innocent, they genuinely do believe he is innocent, but under a different set of “laws.” They therefore understand this to be a “modern day lynching” in the sense that Karmelo is being forced to submit to the law of the white man, and therefore his right to murder on behalf of his manhood, which they do sincerely believe is his right, was “violated.”

[Andy @PositivFuturist]

Come on liberals - it’s Friday, and it appears the far right have another talking point.

Explain how this is fine because white criminals exist.

Tell us how the 3rd world is only unsafe for women because of colonialism.

Tell us how our ancestors who built civilisation, ended slavery, defeated fascism and invented the very internet you use to express - that they are uniquely evil.

Tell us how our society should continue to operate on guilt.

Then do it again tomorrow, and the next day.

[Eva Vlaardingerbroek @EvaVlaar]

The left’s favorite fallacy: They claim right-wingers ‘use’ attacks like this to further our own ends. No. It’s because of attacks like these, that we ARE right-wing. The idea that we are secretly glad it’s happening so we can “further our agenda” is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard. We want this to stop. We want our people to be safe. And it’s because of leftist policies that they are not.

[Rush @exRAF_Al]

The same Lewis Hamilton who used a corporate leasing structure to save money on taxes (around £3.3 million in VAT) when acquiring his Bombardier Challenger 605 private jet in 2013? The same Lewis Hamilton who bought the £16.5 million jet through his British Virgin Islands company (Stealth Aviation Ltd) and who then set up an Isle of Man leasing company (Stealth (IOM) Ltd, to import it into the EU and sub-leased it to a UK jet management firm (TAG Aviation), which in turn provided it back to Hamilton and his Guernsey company under charter agreements? *That* Lewis Hamilton?

[RAW EGG NATIONALIST @Babygravy9]

Crimes like this reveal the strange magic of “racism” and the power it endows non-white people with in Western nations. A word or words are now more damning, morally and legally, than the gravest physical crimes, if uttered by the wrong person—i.e. a white person.

In the US recently, a homeless black man was acquitted of stabbing a white man on the street, because the homeless man claimed the victim had called him the N-word—AFTER the stabbing. The N-word, and racism more generally, have taken on the power not only in our imaginations and culture but also in our legal systems to change the past retroactively.

[Jonatan Pallesen @jonatanpallesen]

Immigrants from the Muslim world have far higher rates of grievous assault.

But even this extreme overrepresentation is an underestimate for the risk they bring to normal people like Alex Coughlan.

The reason is that many of the recorded grievous assaults happen between people who know each other and are involved in the criminal milieu.

But if we look at the risk of a normal family man being assaulted and killed by people he never met before, the Muslim overrepresentation is even more extreme.

No country keeps track of statistics of such victims like Alex Coughlan. We just keep having more mass immigration of Muslims.

[ZAMidnightSpookshow @ZASpookshow]

And while this phony cunt desperately tries to get attention off her dinner with Epstein, Matt and Shane had Sheryl Underwood on their show who said laughing helps grief and what a great time she had.

[Steve Byrne @stevebyrnelive]

This is rich coming from her. Here's a personal story of the irony here: 2007, CH does The Tonight show w Jay Leno. She makes fun of Angelina Jolie & her newly adopted son, 3 yr old Pax, who is Asian.

CH: “He probably doesn’t even realize he’s Asian yet! He certainly doesn’t know he’s going to be a horrible driver… or that he’s going to be amazing at doing nails!”

The next few days there was plenty of outrage, disappointment & accusations of racism levied against NBC.

2 weeks later, I'm booked on The Tonight Show & I've already had my set approved. I was told, I can't tell any of my jokes because of the blowback of her hacky, racist jokes. Yes, I couldn't tell jokes about being Asian because she did so much damage making fun of Asians.

Then, weeks later of 2007, I performed at a showcase where CH was present. Prior to, I had never spoken to, met or interacted with her & as I was wrapping up my set, I mentioned her in the crowd? It's odd to see a comedian sitting in a showcase watching w audience, so I mentioned it in passing. She then yelled out "you're doing a great little Asian job".

MY POINT: I personally know Shane & Tony aren't racist. In fact, I don't think Chelsea is racist. Sure, she's got a long history of promiscuity, an affinity for day drinking, publicly stated she's prescribed a healthy dose of anti depressants, rumored to be awful to work for or with, has a punch card to a plastic surgeon, accused of punching down in her comedy, never been married or had kids & lives alone in her 50s, had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein but c'mon gang, she's not racist.