I am extremely iffy on this ruling from a moral standpoint but I also have to acknowledge this is probably the correct ruling to preserve rights.
The specific laws regarding CSAM were intentionally crafted to protect victims, not punish people we thought were gross. This is why the law specifies the image needs to be of an actual, named child you can point to as a victim.
Once you get into debates of "we'll it's not of any actual kid but it looks real enough to be" then you're immediately jumping on a slippery slope just waiting for someone to push the line of what "real enough" means.
@MizusPuddle don’t know if you gonna read this or not since there are many comments but I have a bad feeling a lot of folks has lost the true meaning of CSAM🤦
@Jaidcel@KeyTryer No it also replied with emotional and insults there some that called any Ai an “ Ai bro” and then some had their name say Gamer and there are many anti Ai you can spot and they have many ways to respond
@DaveShapi and how do we know Michael is not being paid either he had a blue check so? Is it him getting paid by two people or do we have to follow where the money coming from?