@Jerome_Ocitillo Haha yes, but it didn’t come true, and it didn’t happen after Biden took office, and now Biden’s approach has also made the inflation rate higher and higher, which is temporarily unacceptable
@SashaSorcha963 @GeorgeTakei You are right, I think Biden is constantly dismantling the United States and putting the United States in constant crisis. Inflation is the best proof! !
@davidgocarolina@JohnCleese You are so right. Biden's actions will only lead to the disintegration of the United States. In the end, he will be pushed down by people. Biden is hateful
@robert76216@TeamDeSantis In fact, there is no need to worry about this. This is a struggle between two presidents. You just need to remain neutral. Now the inflation rate in the United States is constantly rising. I don’t think any president can solve this problem for the time being.
The greatest meaning of reunion with family members is to accompany them, so that they do not feel lonely, only the taste of home is the best, of course
The busyness of this age cannot separate the hearts of our family from ours, only time will prove our love for our parents
In proclaiming that President Trump’s assertions and beliefs about illegal/ineligible ballots were incorrect (the entire basis of DOJ’s prosecution), how many mail-in envelopes/ballots do you think Garland’s DOJ personally inspected to determine, at a minimum, a.) signature match b.) age of voter c.) registration status d.) citizenship status e.) residence f.) criminal history (felony bar) g.) whether, upon interviewing envelope signatories, the ballots were unlawfully harvested or collected by a third party h.) whether, upon interviewing signatories, they are willing to attest on penalty of perjury that they themselves filled out and enclosed ballots within or i.) the ballot/envelope was received, completed and submitted in a fashion fully compliant with duly-enacted state law (not announced policy in violation of state law) at the time of the election?
The stunning unconstitutionality of its prosecution aside, how can DOJ even proceed with case until it has first performed the above investigation of a sufficiently large sample of ballot envelopes in every swing state, particularly in Dem strongholds?
Note: this would not be a DOJ “recount” of shaded ovals but a rigorous factual assessment of the human data on ballot envelopes against all existing records and laws to determine the rate of invalid mailed ballots across all battlegrounds.