LishmaLou

[Velvet one @glowingvelvetly]

This is so impressive

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

“Get the hell outta here.”

This is the attitude that our elected officials have for Republican voters — contempt.

“I’m the assh@le saying you can’t come in.”

If you know anyone in South Dakota, please show them this video.

I never ask you to make things viral.

[Bobby D🎙 @robertdunlap947]

Oh my Lord😳, this IS AN EPIC BEAT DOWN🫨! Can you believe the Obumer team stiffed a bunch of black subcontractors (because he’s racist) and now THEY ARE FILLING BANKRUPTCY🤬! If you haven’t figured it out yet, Demonrats ARE PIECES OF 💩!

[Pear Joseph @thepearjoseph]

The popular GC narrative that the “normal gays” who simply wanted equal rights and integration into mainstream society and the “queers” are two very different groups does not match what I observed in my own life.

Almost all of the gays I knew personally who fought for gay marriage and spent decades saying they just wanted to be accepted as ordinary members of society didn’t actually make any effort to integrate into “normie” mainstream life after they won the rights they were fighting for. They continued to center their entire identities around being different, continued to self-segregate socially from straight people, and many of them even embraced the “queer” label once it was reclaimed.

They enjoyed being part of an activist movement and didn’t want to stop even after its core goals had been achieved. It wasn’t just a new group of “queers” appearing and ruining everything; it was also many of the same gay activists who fought for gay rights not wanting to stop fighting because they had built their identities around the struggle itself.

Some of them moved on to trans activism. Others began advocating for the normalization of non-monogamy and even criticizing marriage as “heteronormative,” despite having spent decades fighting for it. They went from saying, “We are just like straight people and want the same things things they want” to saying “we are not like straight people and are not tied down to old-fashioned traditional relationships like them.” I see this kind of talk from “gay not queer” GC gays all the time, so I’m not sure why it’s being blamed entirely on the Q.

I know everyone wants an enemy group to blame their problems on, but the supposed distinction between the “queers” and the “normie gays” is nowhere near as clear-cut as many of you would like it to be.

[LishmaLou @lishma86]

https://t.co/nlpoMTlNU1

[LishmaLou @lishma86]

https://t.co/w63v5zKa7K

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

Like the most vicious, catty girls you can imagine, Candace targets her victims with backbiting, slander, gossip, and innuendo.

In the weeks immediately after Charlie was killed, Candace launched into a steady stream of conspiracy theories about his assassination, strategically planting seeds with an audience already trained to read between her lines. Breadcrumb after breadcrumb, they began assembling a picture in which Erika was a suspect rather than a victim. By the time Candace pivoted in late February to the explicit, named, multi-part docuseries called Bride of Charlie, she was not introducing her followers to a new accusation, she was finally saying out loud what she had spent five months training them to suspect.

A core tenet of Candace's brand is "anti-matriarchy,” but Candace is the embodiment of a 50-year cultural project that has trained women to hate everything Erika Kirk represents: faithful marriage, devout motherhood, public beauty, the intact home, the woman who actually loves her husband.

The ‘negative feminine’ archetype displayed by Candace isn’t new— it has been documented in human literature and theology for thousands of years and explored by thinkers from Carl Jung and Jordan Peterson. And it’s values now guide our online culture:

[Real America's Voice (RAV) @RealAmVoice]

IMPORTANT BREAKDOWN: DATA SET BEING USED TO SMEAR CONSERVATIVES

@bungarsargon eloquently breaks down debunking that political violence comes from the right. This is worth a listen! "The left loves to use highfalutin fancy credentialism...this is not a both sides ISSUE."

@AndrewKolvet

[David Medina 🌲🇺🇸 @davidmedinapdx]

🔥 NEW AD: Oregon was built by people who don’t back down. People who work hard, speak truth, and stand up for what’s right even when it’s not easy.

This isn’t about left vs. right. It’s about whether we still believe in safe communities, real opportunity, a future our kids are proud to inherit, and FREEDOM and JUSTICE FOR ALL.

The political elite and Democrat rule has had its chance, and it’s failing too many Oregonians.

It’s time to rise, rebuild, and take our state back with courage, common sense, conviction, and with almighty God as our guide.

Oregon’s best days aren’t behind us, they’re waiting on what we do next.

VOTE DAVID MEDINA FOR GOVERNOR ON MAY 19. BALLOTS DROP THIS WEEK! Deadline to register to vote or change registration is APRIL 28!

Help us PUSH THIS AD by donating at https://t.co/pDOns9aRKX

[Janet Murray @jan_murray]

I didn’t really get the problem with gender ideology at first.

I’m liberal-minded about most things. 'Live and let' live has generally been my motto. I believed inclusion mattered. I believed in being kind. In not using language that might upset people unnecessarily.

I knew people who identified as transgender. I knew some adults chose medical treatments or surgery to resemble the opposite sex. That seemed to me a matter of personal autonomy. Adults can do what they wish with their own bodies.

What I hadn’t realised - and I feel slightly embarrassed admitting this - was that I’d misunderstood what was being claimed.

I thought “transgender” meant a form of self-expression. A man who liked wearing women’s clothes. Someone changing their name. Gender non-conformity.

What I hadn’t grasped was that some activists weren’t just asking for tolerance. They were asserting that declaring yourself the opposite sex made you the opposite sex. Not metaphorically. Literally.

And that this wasn’t just cultural. It had legal consequences.

- It meant men who said they were women were demanding access to women’s sports, prisons, domestic violence shelters and hospital wards

- It meant the rewriting of healthcare language - “pregnant people”, “bodies with cervixes” - to avoid saying “women”

- It meant children struggling with identity being affirmed onto medical pathways with lifelong implications

And also redefining same-sex attraction. Lesbians called 'bigoted' for not wanting relationships with men who identify as women. Gay men accused of prejudice for saying they're not attracted to female bodies. None of which made any sense.

But I'd also overlooked how far this had travelled - into HR policies, professional bodies, schools, political parties and public institutions.

And how easily disagreement was framed as cruelty. Speaking up felt risky - because others were being publicly humiliated for doing so.

None of this is abstract.

Because sex is the basis on which safeguarding works. On which data is collected. On which cancer screening programmes run. On which fair sport and single-sex spaces depend. It’s written into law - including the Equality Act - because material differences matter.

If sex becomes a 'feeling' rather than a biological category, those protections become unstable.

And once reality becomes negotiable, everything does.

Once I saw it, I couldn’t unsee it.
But I needed to be sure.

So I read. Books, research papers, policy documents. When I finally spoke publicly, there was backlash from all directions.

Many women thanked me - both quietly and publicly.
But some feminists criticised me for speaking too late.

Others were angry about a past interview I’d done with the parent of a transgender person, accusing me of promoting harm.

It takes courage to change your mind publicly.

It takes courage to speak when you know your reputation, friendships or livelihood may be on the line - when you know raising your voice could strain, or even end, relationships you value.

Once I understood what was at stake, staying silent was no longer an option. I lost my livelihood simply for saying I didn’t like the phrase “pregnant people”. That alone tells you something is deeply wrong. It shouldn’t be this way.

I will never judge any woman for when she finds her voice.

Because every voice adds value - whenever it is raised.

And I know how persuasive this ideology can be. I know how easily it bypassed me. And I know how much courage it takes to admit, publicly, that you got something wrong.

[Iris Seraphina  @iris_seraphina]

90s games vs. today's games: How they shaped our brains differently. The impact is wild. 🎮🕹️👾🧠

#Gaming #90sGames #RetroGaming #BrainFacts #VideoGames

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

BREAKING: 4 people kiIIed in Indiana after truck driver crashed into their car.

The driver, Bekzhan Beishekeev, is a Kyrgyzstani national whom Biden imported into our country. He now has an ICE detainer hold.

Why does this keep happening?

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

WOW!

Just went on national television to give a grave, peaceful warning:

“My warning to Members of Congress that are not willing to pass election reform at the federal level — which is constitutional:

Either Republicans provide for proof of citizenship & photo voter ID

OR it’s very likely that Republican voters will NOT come out on Tuesday, November 3rd, 2026

& we very likely could lose the House of Representatives & Senate seats in Alaska, Maine, & North Carolina.”

Pass the SAVE Act!

@kayleighmcenany @SatAmericaFNC

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Helen Andrews drops a provocative thesis: Feminization = wokeness.

Everything we call "woke"—empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition, inclusion over free speech—is just the natural outcome of institutions becoming majority-female since the 1970s.

She points to surveys: ~2/3 men prioritize free speech, ~2/3 women prioritize inclusive society. Men lean "ethics of justice" (rules/facts), women "ethics of caring" (context/relationships/emotions).

Examples: James Damore fired not for facts but because it made women "feel bad." Kavanaugh hearings: masculine side demanded evidence, feminine side focused on "she's crying."

Her take: When women predominate, politics/institutions tilt toward subjective feelings over objective rules—even if many women reject it (e.g., best Kavanaugh books by women critics).

This 2:46 clip is bold, polarizing, and ties demographic shifts to cultural ones.

Agree it's a key driver of wokeness? Or overreach? What's your read on the gender gaps in free speech/inclusion polls?

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

At the Syracuse Community Center until 7 p.m.

ONE signature away from personally completing 2 full petition packets to repeal Prop 4.

Working hard for you, Utah.

📍Syracuse Community Center

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) is pushing for Leader John Thune to BRING THE SAVE ACT to a VOTE on the floor, finally securing our elections against illegals voting

GOOD, we need EVERY GOP senator, keep the pressure up!

Pass this, and win 2026. 🇺🇸

[John Stossel @JohnStossel]

“I spent nights sending complaints to get @BenShapiro’s posts blocked,” says one student in @CoddlingMovie.

Here’s more about ridiculous things she learned in college:

[𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇 @pr0ud_americans]

Don’t mistake kindness for weakness.

This reel hits hard: Political correctness is just cowardice letting radical Islam grow unchecked. Stop appeasing, start defending Western values before it's too late. 💪🇬🇧🇺🇸

[Thomas More Society @ThomasMoreSoc]

California is doing everything it can to undo our landmark parental rights victory in Mirabelli v. Bonta.

We're not giving up on California's parents, teachers, and students yet.

Yesterday, Thomas More Society attorneys filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting immediate intervention in Mirabelli v. Bonta.

"Parental Exclusion Policies" need to go.

👉 Follow to receive critical case updates.

@PaulJonna

[LishmaLou @lishma86]

@iam_preethi Dr's are always shocked when I dont want the pill and never been on it at 40. I manage/track my cycle and plan accordingly. Ive had 1 pregnancy, no others. It can be done. It is not a net negative but I feel like its way over prescribed, especially to young women.