We need better decision-making frameworks when choosing COVID-19 measures. Here is our freshly published paper arguing for multi-criteria decision methods on pandemic responses, with an example application on mitigation strategies in Romania 👇https://t.co/aQtFsQeN0V
Have you ever suspected editorial bias in quite well-known academic journals? Double-blind peer review over, but the handling editor has been silent for almost three months. Any advice on how to handle that?
#AcademicTwitter
Where research pays better, there is more competition and more men are chosen. Where the research is poorly paid, the competition is lower, so there are more positions available for women. Poorly paid research means less prestige, fewer outreach possibilities, less power.
100% true no amount of fact-checking will give people in intensely polarized US “a common ground of reality on which to stand” as @Sulliview wrote Aug 29. But since many seem to jump from that to idea fact-checking doesn’t work, public service announcement RE"backfire effect” 1/9
In the wake of the pandemic, 'vulnerable categories' have mostly included those groups directly affected by the virus. But there's a huge group too few have cared about, directly affected by various mitigation measures: the poor. Where's the equity in crisis management?
Where are all the people who insisted that we’re living in the golden age of global poverty eradication just a few months ago? And why aren’t they tweeting about the impact of Covid on the poor right now? 🤔
@vladcostea Same here, I have some mild symptoms though, so I called my ENT doctor, described everything, and she sent me to get tested. If it's not Covid, it's tonsilitis that needs some prescription meds, so for me, the test is useful for an accurate diagnosis and treatment.
In #scicomm, does communicating uncertainty have negative effects?
Our review [now out in @SciPublic] finds that in most cases, the answer is NO.
🚨 But there is an important exception where it is clearly harmful:
uncertainty in the form of DISAGREEMENT/CONFLICT.
[thread]
1/x
Writing a paper on UK coronavirus policy (https://t.co/e2Zhw6RPJq) and it is taking much longer than usual. One vague explanation is that I have rarely felt so uneasy about writing. Every policy change would seem profound on its own, but the cumulative effect is overwhelming.
@RobertLepenies True. It's not instrumentalized yet politically. And there are no significant divisions in terms of policy and discourses for now. I think this will change in some months though...
Many are struggling these days in lockdown with stress, demotivation, anxiety, boredom, loneliness, depression. The romantic genius striving in isolation is a myth. For real people, this is a useful article. Step by step through #COVIDー19 https://t.co/IADnH6v6hq
Great endeavour, I hope there will be as many people as possible answering, including from countries with different responses to the pandemic, from Sweden to Austria, Romania, etc. Share and get involved #COVID19
How do we take political decisions during turbulent times? Take part & share our study as we are trying to reach as many citizens. English version @GorillaPsyc : https://t.co/30HeiMCkD5 | EU languages : GR|DE +AU/CH |IT|FR|PL|SI 👇| @RHULPsychology@RHULSocialSci@Warburg_News
https://t.co/F8XiF5Uol7 "Optimizing public health during this pandemic also requires knowledge from the social and behavioural sciences." Great synthesis on threats and risk perception, cultural and social norms, science communication and decision-making by @jayvanbavel et all