Hello @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”
My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.
The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”
I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”
I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.
To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.
My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM
HAPPY BIRTHDAY NISHI-SENSEI!!!! WE LOVE YOU QUEEEENNN!!!
THIS CRAZY GIRL DOING TWO MANGAS AT THE SAME TIME AND SUPERVISING SEVERAL SPIN-OFFS OF HER FIRST WORK 🎉🎉🎉
the harassment syundei has faced makes me feel violently ill. i truly hope that everyone who participated in it goes to hell, so that they experience a fraction of the treatment they gave syundei due to their holier-than-thou attitude over her art.
but my anger cant support syundei. if you are able to, please consider purchasing a first-hand copy (physical or ebook) of ganbare nakamurakun, or her other works! i got vol 1 and 2 as ebooks from dmm books, but i have found it is also currently available on renta, and for the physical books, on animate and melonbooks! please note: i found them on the domestic japanese sites, so you will need a vpn or proxy! but there may be more places, so look around!!!
and then, i hope that if she chooses to return to here, we have enough love and energy in our hearts to loudly support her as much as we can :)
So, the usual homophobic gang has found the series and are plummeting its ratings everywhere. If you’re a fan and enjoying it so far, consider leaving a nice review and stars. I know the quality isn’t ideal, but we need to show support to keep having adaptations!
‘Demon Slayer’ creators on the future of AI in anime:
“Our studio, Aniplex and Ufotable, will continue to work with our HAND-DRAWN artists, our writers, our voice actors, and the talent that help bring this emotion to the big screen.”
man im tired i dont care about women liking yaoi i dont care about your damn het ships i dont care about yaoi vs yuri i dont care that you think omegaverse is unethical oh my god stop recycling discourse no one gives a fuck