Making Reading Great Again

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer @CapturingChrist Ah the hyperbole fallback 😂🤡 The amount of times this is used on the internet is hilarious. Go ahead and pretend I don’t know what hyperbole is. You know what really went on here. Move that goal post bud😂

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

You’re just not up to par intellectually if you think repeating the same assertion that’s obviously false is proper. It’s a fact, 100%, that there’s necessarily a contingent of people that feel like Protestantism is at risk due to the claims. A majority of people haven’t looked into the miracle claims and will therefore be exposed to them even more that a respected philosopher is giving them credence.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

You’re just going to have a hyper specific definition of what people mean by panicking. You have fun quibbling over words lol. Like I said you’re proving yourself to be a useless person to discuss anything with.

“Protestants are mad”… “no no they’re upset, mad and upset are different”#deboonked

get a life😂

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer @CapturingChrist I literally proved you wrong and your actively being ignorant lol. What’s the Bible say about that huh? You’re not worth the time😂

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@IustusEt Wowww goood oneeee. Name calling😂You really got him.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@John_Wells_1 @IustusEt How would it not make sense?

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@Curi_Christian Just not true

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@vatican2spirit Odd response

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

“Literally no one.” Says this while other Protestants are admitting there’s a lot of ecclesial anxiety going on, admitted by Anglican Aesthetics as an example.

Not that ecclesial anxiety or panicking really matters because people get convinced by coal all the time, but to say “literally no one is panicking”, is a bit of an understatement to say the least.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

But the purpose of his channel has changed, so the content he wants up will necessarily change. If I had a pro-abortion channel, and I became fully convinced of the opposite, it would make sense that I’m not going to leave up arguments for abortion. This is a pretty normal evolution of a channel. Channels are owned by people, and people change their mind.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

I just don’t see why you’re assuming that. People delete videos all the time if they don’t like a view they espoused. Christians even do it with their old Christian content at times. I just think you’re overstating the expectation a channel has when hosting other creators on their platform.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@dog_domain @theRTMullins He doesn’t. You do a video on other people’s channels with the awareness that it can be taken down by the channel owner whenever they want.

Unless he has some promise that he wouldn’t. But I doubt it.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@w2ely1 How is he a complete retard?

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@LarsTheBadMan How would you know it’s bs if you didn’t watch it genius?

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@joshwhitlatch No it doesn’t

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@theRTMullins “Recent” is relative. Time spent doing something, and time passed in general are not the same thing. You know that.

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@NateBornAgain “Except maybe heretics” just presupposes stuff you don’t know to defend

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@JoelMCurzon @dannyphiltalk Straight over your head lol

[Making Reading Great Again @Ljhm378]

@rightscholar He sounds like an ass by telling someone to properly represent him? Looks like you never stopped