This clown was posted before he always appear once he jeet their bag bought at lows imo
Harry from Tao behavior, they always fud when they sell
base:0x9b5e262cf9bb04869ab40b19af91d2dc85761722
Hackers exploited $NOCK for 89 million coins. The entire LP can be drained at any moment โ with a single transaction.
The only question that matters now is simple: what happens when the bridge comes back online?
Those 89 million coins will not remain isolated. They will enter circulation. Multiple unrelated wallets have already received funds from the exploit. That is the dump queue forming in plain sight.
And here is the contradiction. The team announced that a fix had been deployed. Proof rate is still at all-time highs. They are effective at writing statements. They are effective at announcing patches. They have not been effective at stopping the chain from bleeding.
Exit now โ before this gets rugged and you are the last one holding the bag.
I donโt have to, I could just ignore obviously and go enjoy Labor day like a normal human being
I donโt get paid more or less if I reply to this stuff and nobody can make me reply to stuff
Iโm trying to make CB better and so seeing/reading feedback is useful, acknowledging where things can improve, and correcting the record where it is wrong
A lot of crypto natives obvs really dislike CB / Base so itโs kinda like swimming up a waterfall but for some reason I am motivated to make things better
Just going to hold bittensor:native (subnet 10,11,53) and base:0x9b5e262cf9bb04869ab40b19af91d2dc85761722 and wait patiently.
Patience will pay off, just have to sit on my hands for a few months and will be rewarded heavily
Can a blockchain reward miners for more than one kind of verifiable computation?
Bitcoin gives every miner the same basic task: search for a valid hash. This provides a consistent measure of mining power because more hashpower means a greater chance of producing the next block. Hashing works well for consensus even though its output has little value outside the blockchain.
Nockchain replaces hash grinding as the costly mining work with generating proofs over NockVM computation. More proofpower gives a miner a greater chance of producing the next valid block, analogous to hashpower in Bitcoin.
Nockchain extends this model beyond a single kind of work. Its base ZKPoW network rewards NockVM proof generation. A separate AI PoW network lets inference providers reuse existing model computation while competing for PoW rewards. Each has its own difficulty and incentive structure.
For proof-based mining to work, proofpower has to remain tied to fresh computation. A miner's chance of winning should scale with effective proofpower without allowing previous work to be reused or amortized across new mining puzzles.
The protocol addresses this by cryptographically binding each puzzle to fresh inputs. Extending the model into a broader compute market introduces another requirement: there also has to be external demand for the computation being incentivized.
Can a blockchain reward miners for more than one kind of verifiable computation?
Bitcoin gives every miner the same basic task: search for a valid hash. This provides a consistent measure of mining power because more hashpower means a greater chance of producing the next block. Hashing works well for consensus even though its output has little value outside the blockchain.
Nockchain replaces hash grinding as the costly mining work with generating proofs over NockVM computation. More proofpower gives a miner a greater chance of producing the next valid block, analogous to hashpower in Bitcoin.
Nockchain extends this model beyond a single kind of work. Its base ZKPoW network rewards NockVM proof generation. A separate AI PoW network lets inference providers reuse existing model computation while competing for PoW rewards. Each has its own difficulty and incentive structure.
For proof-based mining to work, proofpower has to remain tied to fresh computation. A miner's chance of winning should scale with effective proofpower without allowing previous work to be reused or amortized across new mining puzzles.
The protocol addresses this by cryptographically binding each puzzle to fresh inputs. Extending the model into a broader compute market introduces another requirement: there also has to be external demand for the computation being incentivized.
Can a blockchain reward miners for more than one kind of verifiable computation?
Bitcoin gives every miner the same basic task: search for a valid hash. This provides a consistent measure of mining power because more hashpower means a greater chance of producing the next block. Hashing works well for consensus even though its output has little value outside the blockchain.
Nockchain replaces hash grinding as the costly mining work with generating proofs over NockVM computation. More proofpower gives a miner a greater chance of producing the next valid block, analogous to hashpower in Bitcoin.
Nockchain extends this model beyond a single kind of work. Its base ZKPoW network rewards NockVM proof generation. A separate AI PoW network lets inference providers reuse existing model computation while competing for PoW rewards. Each has its own difficulty and incentive structure.
For proof-based mining to work, proofpower has to remain tied to fresh computation. A miner's chance of winning should scale with effective proofpower without allowing previous work to be reused or amortized across new mining puzzles.
The protocol addresses this by cryptographically binding each puzzle to fresh inputs. Extending the model into a broader compute market introduces another requirement: there also has to be external demand for the computation being incentivized.
Coin fund founder so bullish on $nock since 2023
You donโt realize it yet
Itโs oke
You will realize in due time
Can find a bunch of these, this is like discover ethereum during 2015
Fewwww
.@ZorpZK has built some really impressive Nock-native ZKP computation & verification poised to outperform non-Nock approaches.
(Nock is Urbitโs native assembly language that can now be used broadly.)
Immediate application is an Urbit-native ZK rollup with Hoon smart contracts.
Trading memes is just a casino with like 20-25% odds of winning, youโre competing vc paid KOLโs, serial ruggers, serial deployers, probability wise it just does not make any sense
If you dont have an edge, try to buy into projects where you can get a fundamental edge (yes very difficult)
@AlgodTrading@littlestjeff3@KAPOTHEGOAT01 Curious, how should the project be improved so that you can consider increasing your bag?
I mean, they are really cooking. Every day it looks better.