Two important essays were published this week on the theme that the climate movement is now a serious national security risk for the US and Europe. This one in Tablet magazine:
https://t.co/Q6MwRRGklL
is by 2 authors, one from the Hudson Inst in DC and the other a professor at the Naval Postgrad Academy in CA. They trace the links between China and the western Net Zero movement, which is partly financial, but works mostly through influence operations by which the CCP gains exemption from criticism by western green groups despite its own coal-intensive and slave labor-dependent growth strategy.
This one:
https://t.co/SV6YJ0ufUr
is by Richard Dearlove, former head of MI5, explaining how China's influence ops in the UK led to deindustrialization and a precarious dependence on China; to the extent that the UK could not now reindustrialize or stabilize its electricity grid without seeking assistance from Beijing.
Dearlove's paper raises the possibility that a security agency like MI5 saw a threat building but was unable to address it because of a perception that climate science forbids criticizing Net Zero and related measures. A question I think worth asking is whether western intelligence agencies have internalized the green Net Zero mindset thereby preventing them from challenging the climate alarmism so effectively weaponized by the CCP. And if they now want to start doing so, would they know how, or have the capacity to do so.
"the COVID-19 mandates were unlawful as applied to drugs classified as investigational and products immune from civil liability. "
Some of us have known this for years.
BREAKING: Former governors Inslee (WA) and Brown (OR) filed responses in two SCOTUS cases. Asked what authority they had to mandate COVID products immune from liability while bound by federal contracts requiring voluntary consent, they pointed to the Ninth Circuit—which ignored those contracts.
The question is whether states can mandate experimental drugs while also requiring a waiver of the right to sue if injured. Neither governor could defend the 9th Circuit's opinion, nor did they try. In other words, America, the COVID-19 mandates were unlawful as applied to drugs classified as investigational and products immune from civil liability.
Why? You hold a privilege of citizenship and a fundamental right to sue when injured, and states are precluded from using coercion to separate you from that right by punishing you for refusing drugs immune from civil liability. This fact has 200 years of Supreme Court precedent behind it. These cases END all vaccine mandates in the nation as we now know them. Stand by for major updates coming over the next two weeks.