UK police apparently don’t want anyone talking about this man who was attacked by a muslim migrant gang
They told him not to talk about it
So definitely don’t talk about it or share… that would be really bad…
@RoyalFamily You’re despicable Charles! You welcome Harry and Meghan despite their repeated attempts to bully and sabotage the Princess of Wales, and you express condolences for a Qatari, whilst failing to mention the murder of a British politician. Will you ever put Brits first?
I am having a drink this evening with a friend in a Chiswick pub. Two policemen have just come into the pub and asked me to step outside. I have stepped outside and they have threatened me because I tweeted about a councillor banning seating outside pubs in Chiswick. They admit on video (watch it!) that I did not break the law at all. They came to threaten me. To warn me off tweeting about councillors and the council. This is modern Britain. This is the police state. Please, please, please watch this video. It does involve me using very bad language, but this has got to be seen. Police coming out to threaten someone who hasn’t committed a crime. I’m fuming.
@EnglandUK There’s no way I, as a single woman, would allow a potential rapist and murderer in my home. An illegal migrant is t welcome in my country, certainly not my refuge.
@muhdmustapha001 10/10. The first job of any government is the protection of its citizens. When governments across the west willingly fail them, as a result of bowing down to faceless globalists, we have to defend ourselves. This scene and the Judge scene are incredibly moving.
@ukhomeoffice@DefenceHQ Why was there no announcement of this in Parliament? You can’t just bypass our elected representatives and announce policy in the media.
@ukhomeoffice Let us examine each of those assurances against what is actually documented.
"Safe and legal routes." The nationalities you are prioritising under the community sponsorship scheme are Sudanese and Eritrean nationals, chosen specifically, in your own words, because they currently represent some of the largest groups crossing the Channel illegally. The scheme does not create a route for people who would not otherwise come. It creates a legal pipeline for people already coming, running alongside the illegal one, while the removal rate for those arriving illegally remains four percent. Safe and legal is the rebranding. The destination is the same.
"Numbers will start small and be controlled." You have signed accommodation contracts running until 2039. You opened twelve new asylum centres this week without informing the MPs in whose constituencies they sit. Speaker Lindsay Hoyle called it totally unacceptable from the chair. Canada's community sponsorship scheme, cited by your own Home Secretary as the model, has resettled more than 390,000 refugees since 1979, including more than 30,000 in 2024 alone. Small is a description of the announcement. It is not a description of the trajectory.
"Strict screening." Britain has no biometric registry for Sudan or Eritrea. In January 2026 al-Hol camp in northeast Syria, holding around 9,000 male ISIS suspects from 60 countries, collapsed. A hundred and twenty ISIS members escaped from Shaddadi prison. Syria confirmed a mass escape of ISIS-linked individuals. Their whereabouts are unknown. A British family sponsoring a refugee from Sudan or Eritrea cannot verify identity, criminal history or conflict zone involvement for someone from a country with no functioning civil record. The UNHCR referral process does not fill that gap. It never has. Calling that strict screening is not reassurance. It is the absence of an answer dressed as one.
Your statement does not address the 2001 UN Replacement Migration report that established mass immigration as the primary policy tool for managing demographic decline. It does not address the 2015 Agenda 2030 commitment or the 2018 Marrakech compact that normalised it. It does not address the Teal Book that ties British institutional policy explicitly to those commitments. It does not explain why the nationalities prioritised are the same nationalities currently crossing illegally at record rates.
Small numbers, controlled, strictly screened. That is what you said about the asylum hotel system before it produced 339 charges in six months across half the hotels in operation. Britain already knows what Home Office assurances look like in practice.