@MVG_Mew2King Plus if your company you founded and own gets valued at $1B, under your model you would need to sell the company and give it to multiple people.
@MVG_Mew2King It's human nature. People do things in their best interest, especially neurotypical people. Unless there is some sort of religious reason, it's very rare.
Government policy and the banking / financial system are more important tbh, you need to get at the root of the issue.
@c_gomez007 At this point, I think that people should be respecting the decision from the TOs, rather than trying to usurp their control to prevent him from rejoining the community. If I were the TOs, I would not appreciate people undermining the process and conducting vigilante justice.
@c_gomez007 As for the right to forgive, punishment and forgiveness are two different things. Forgiveness is generally for when someone has wronged you, and you choose to forgive that person. In this case, the people discussing this were never wronged in the first place.
@c_gomez007 Just seems strange you guys always want permanent bans, and you don't want people to even play different games or go do something else, they need to be banned from literally everything. Might as well just erase them from history. Have to bring in the buster call.
@bplaysstuff@RealLtBud Also I think it makes more sense to put in the coaching, "X much / hour", but then there is another option, "alternatively, play this game and do XYZ and you get a free coaching session". Latter option is for people who can't afford to pay. That comes across as totally voluntary.
@bplaysstuff@RealLtBud If the risk/reward ratio is good, it could make sense.. but overall I think it makes more sense that coaching, streaming, and YouTube is his main job, and if he needs something on top of that, since he has a genuine disability he should get $ from the government.