十方

[十方 @LM201012]

https://t.co/GoqF9Jm1Dy

[yiqii @1_qqqii]

holy shit
$BTJ
CYJUj3nk2PWx1VvFbj2jwMw21co27ZEGSRZotnNGBAGS

[molu @molusol]

if you are looking for @perps on solana:

> memes: @perpadfun

> permissionless: @PercolatorTrade

> social perps; @TradeFighters

> any sol coin: @derp_trade

> agent trading: @ColadaPerps

> best ux: @jtx_trade

> built for speed: @bulletxyz

> great yields: @adrenafi

> aggregator: @ImperialPerps

> fast and cheap: @PhoenixTrade

> easiest to use: @JupiterExchange

> trading game: @clashofperps

> banger but in beta: @bulktrade

> deep liquidity: @pacificafi

> no order book: @FlashTrade

> rwa perps: @gmtrade_xyz

[Justin Drake @drakefjustin]

Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder.

On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures.

But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first!

As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise.

Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours.

Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure.

Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice!

The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :)

Part 2: neutral atoms and qday

The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers.

Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low.

Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts.

My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom".

Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions.

So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030.

Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years.

Part 3: post-quantum cryptography

There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation.

These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer.

The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security.

Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.

[DEGEN NEWS @DegenerateNews]

NEW: BITCOIN ENTHUSIAST CLAIMS THAT HE RECOVERED HIS 11+ YEAR LOCKED BTC WALLET BY FEEDING HIS OLD COLLEGE COMPUTER FILES INTO CLAUDE AI, WHICH FOUND THE WALLET FILE DECRYPTED BY AN OLD MNEMONIC

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

At 15 years old, Liv Perrotto’s biggest dream was to meet @elonmusk. She had even written out a list of questions to ask him. Her mother @rebeccaperrotto told me that just days before she passed away from cancer, she had a chance to speak with Elon, but she was too tired and asked him to call later. The questions still sit on her nightstand, unanswered. Liv's mother shared them with me in hopes that Elon would change that today.

1) Are you going to make your own phone?
2) Are you expanding the Tesla Diner to new areas?
3) Will there be any new games with any upcoming Tesla updates?
4) What is your favorite anime?
5) Have you ever been to Japan? What was your favorite place/thing there?
6) Do you know who Hatsune Miku is?
7) Was Ani inspired from Misa from Death Note?
8) Can you make Asteroid (the Shiba Inu zero-g indicator she designed for the Polaris Dawn mission) the mascot for SpaceX?

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: Microsoft plans to buy ~139 million square feet of land in Wyoming for datacenter expansion.

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: Microsoft to take over Norway data center project originally intended for OpenAI’s Stargate initiative.

[十方 @LM201012]

@MGGA_BSC 这看着像斯诺克台球杆啊 cz 开始打斯诺克了？

[Phyrex @PhyrexNi]

我很喜欢 X ，尤其是这次战争让我看到 X 并没有对美国的“敌人”进行封锁，即便伊朗的领袖说着要反抗美国，但他仍然能够在 X 上表达自己的意愿，不止是 哈梅内伊 ，我看到很多伊朗的官员都在 X 上表达自己对美国的不满。

这些都在 X 上表现出来了，是不是有降权我不知道，但起码在搜索的时候能看到，下边很多人讨论即便是不利于美国的也能正常显示出来。

可能这就是马斯克接手以后要表达的“最大限度的言论自由”吧。

[Phyrex @PhyrexNi]

风老师说的现在是国内的一个真相，就目前的就业情况，很多学生不论是什么专业的毕业即失业（中国 2026 年高校毕业生预计约 1270 万，再创新高），尤其是现在中国国内对英文的教育环境不是很好，即便是大学四级考出来的，可能口语水平也一塌糊涂。

更别提大学毕业干十年到了 30 岁可能就会遇到职场危机，在多过五年可能就会面临被优化的局面，辛辛苦苦读书十六年，能安稳工作的可能也就是十六年。

我经常和身边的小伙伴建议，最起码让自己的孩子学好英语，以后可以去更大的世界卷，尤其是在选专业的时候，如果能和世界接轨，活下去会容易很多。

[十方 @LM201012]

@aa_AFeng 好吧，好像是10月份就赚了1点点，然后... 你悟了，bsc完全操作手册。

[十方 @LM201012]

@Web3heinu 这是什么地方 不错环境 云南吗？

[Patrick Collison @patrickc]

• According to the story, the dog's cancer has not been cured.
• Absent all regulatory and manufacturing constraints, we could not just synthesize magic mRNA cancer cures. The technology is very promising, but it's not yet any kind of panacea.
• The emergent system of regulators and manufacturers is indeed far too conservative, and small-scale experimentation is much harder than it should be. More people should read the first part of The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. Recommend @RuxandraTeslo, @PatrickHeizer for more.

[杰克船长宏观策略 @macrotradecn]

openclaw流行的结果：
1.苹果🍎很开心，因为mac mini又疯狂销售了一波
2。作者很开心，有了知名度也加入OpenAl，赚的盆满钵满
3.OpenAl很开心，收编了作者，GPT5.4加强了，电脑操作更蹭了一波热度
4。其他大模型厂家很开心，因为openclaw很费token，又卖了很多API，而且openclaw越火，就能拉来更多的投资，何乐而不为?
5。云服务器厂家很开心，弄了一键部署，很多人尝
鲜养虾会买一台服务器试试
6。黑客很开心，从没打过这么富裕的仗
7。普通人呢，大部分也挺开心的，因为觉得自己养了一个龙虾就跟上时代潮流了，自己也能当老板指挥AI员工了，和别人也有谈资，仅限于自己的龙虾没出事
一圈下来，大家都很开心，大家都有光明的未来。至于龙虾是不是屎山代码，谁会在乎呢?

[十方 @LM201012]

@MrBeast @grok 是谁？

[十方 @LM201012]

@TINA1021A @haze0x 我都怀疑 我说的那些东西 他们不知道是什么

[十方 @LM201012]

@TINA1021A @haze0x 我跟你说 他们技术不知道从什么地方调研的 把好的全部删了 改的花里胡哨，看着就头晕

[十方 @LM201012]

@haze0x 之前单独已开盘界面，有5分 1分 1小时 交易量 百分比 持币人数 ，而且右键直接就能进入网页。用电脑多开网页的，都觉得方便。 现在这些显示不了 ，持币什么的全是图标挤在一起 ！