@conradusclemens@realTimaV@vonderleyen Oh that easy job of just making it better AND cheaper AND safer. People will always choose the cheap option. Which is why we have minimum rules for safety. But it's hard to police everything, so we use tariffs to nudge instead of ban. It's just realpolitik.
@conradusclemens@realTimaV@vonderleyen By making the business model of selling cheap unsafe shit unviable. I'm not saying it's a perfect system, but what is the alternative? Let our retailers die whilst they follow our rules and everyone just uses toxic shit from Shein and Temu?
@realTimaV@vonderleyen You're probably asking ironically, but the serious answer is: it's easier and cheaper to make products that don't follow EU safety guidelines (what is what China does). So the price is cheaper but the products are less safe.
@leRaffl Not saying this is wrong - but important context for extrapolating to the future is that Denmark currently has vastly reduced on the purchase Electric cars which is set to expire in 2027 (I believe). Thought it has been extended a few times.
@jvivas_official@TrungTPhan I work at that same office in Billund. Most people work a normal 8 hour day. But people with kids often go home after 6 hours, then might pop on in the evening for an hour. As long as you deliver managers don’t micromanage hours really.
@JAL1988196662@ScienceQriosity@MichaelAArouet The power imbalance is still large. An employer can pick and choose more than a person who needs a job for their livelihood. Unions help. But can become too powerful. Balance is best.
@jetpackjoe_@theo Peter is open about this: 5.2 codex for coding, opus for “personality”
Otherwise openclaw would have all the personality of stale bread
@adamdotdev IMO 5.2-codex is a multiplier. You put in big brains, you get big brains out. It doesn’t assume things, like opus does. Opus infers intent (often wrongly), and is far more chatty. Codex is like an extremely surly lead engineer. I feel like experienced engineers prefer 5.2-codex.