Luiz da Gama Mór

Aviação, História, Política, Literatura

[Anna @AnnaDeMilanese]

🔥 In Snischne (Oblast Donezk) lauter Einschlag: Energieinfrastruktur unter Beschuss, — Monitore.
Die Folgen des Angriffs werden noch geklärt." Quelle: Telegram-Kanal УС.

In der von Russland besetzten Stadt Snischne meldet ein Beobachtungskanal einen lauten Einschlag in der Energieinfrastruktur – die Ausmaße sind noch unklar, das Ziel liegt mitten im besetzten Donbass.
Monitore berichten von einem Treffer in der Energieversorgung von Snischne, einer Stadt in der seit 2014 russisch besetzten Oblast Donezk. Die Folgen werden laut der Quelle noch geklärt, eine unabhängige Bestätigung liegt bislang nicht vor. Snischne war zuletzt im Mai 2026 Ziel eines Angriffs, bei dem eine Drohnen-Montagewerkstatt und eine Ausbildungsstätte für russische Drohnenoperateure getroffen wurden.

Wir bleiben an diesem Post dran und aktualisieren, sobald es verifizierte Details zu Ziel und Ausmaß gibt.

Schreibt in die Kommentare.
Kontext: Obozrevatel, DonPress.

📌 Folgt @AnnaDeMilanese, um zu sehen, wie sich Meldungen wie diese von der ersten unbestätigten Zeile bis zur verifizierten Bestätigung entwickeln. Speichert euch den Post fürs Update, und schreibt in die Kommentare, was ihr über besetzte Gebiete wie Snischne wissen wollt.

[Anna_From_Ukraine_Official @AnnaFromUA_YT]

🚨 Putin’s hometown is starting to look like an active war zone.

In St. Petersburg, people are reportedly spending hours in long gasoline queues while local authorities prepare 9 metro stations to function as bomb shelters.

That is the contrast Putin cannot hide: in 2022, he promised “Kyiv in three days.” In 2026, his own hometown is preparing shelters while fuel shortages spread and the Kirishi refinery remains disrupted.

Russia is losing gasoline, oil income, and the image of a superpower.

Subscribe to witness what happens next — and share to spread the truth.

#StandWithUkraine #RussiaIsCollapsing #MakeRussiaSmallAgain #RussiaEconomy

[big ben @alternative_war]

🇪🇺🇺🇦 Europe’s €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan is now moving from pledge to delivery.

The EU package—worth roughly $105 billion—covers 2026–2027. It was approved in April, ratified by Ukraine in May, and the first €3 billion tranche has already been disbursed.

For 2026, Ukraine has access to €45 billion:

• €28.3B for defence and defence-industrial capacity;
• €16.7B for budget stability and energy resilience.

Another €45 billion is planned for 2027.

Crucially, the EU has also cleared a targeted exception allowing Ukraine to use an upcoming €3.2B tranche for urgently needed Patriot-related supplies—an important step as Russia intensifies missile attacks ahead of winter.

This is not a blank cheque: further payments are tied to reforms, fiscal transparency and anti-corruption commitments. The intended repayment mechanism is future Russian reparations—not ordinary debt servicing by Ukraine.

The package does not cover every wartime need, but it gives Kyiv a far more stable base to fund defence, keep the state functioning and prepare the energy system for winter.

[Michael @Michaelmog7546]

@nexta_tv TRUMP CREATES QUAGMIRE

Houthis Win Strategic City in Yemen… island also captured

They are supported by Iran 🇮🇷 and Russia 🇷🇺… Trumps USA 🇺🇸 LOSE BIGLEY

Both the ‘Strait of Hormuz’ and ‘Bab al-Mandan’ are now lost 😞… all shipping can now be severed

#MOG8

[NEXTA @nexta_tv]

Trump abandoned Saudi Arabia, refusing it help in the fight against the Houthis

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called Trump twice and asked him to join the strikes against the Houthis, but the White House refused.

At the moment, the United States is providing only intelligence support and does not want to enter a direct conflict.

Previously, Saudi Arabia believed it could handle the Houthis on its own, but the situation has changed sharply.

The Houthis, with Iranian support, are conducting a determined offensive against government forces, aiming to capture all of Yemen and, above all, the strategically important access to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni army is fleeing and is not putting up serious resistance to the Houthis.

Oil has risen to its highest level since May, and the Kremlin is already rubbing its hands with satisfaction.

[Mykhailo Rohoza @MykhailoRohoza]

🇺🇸🧐🤮Pete Hegseth was reportedly handed a briefing card explaining why a highly decorated U.S. general was not responsible for security at the site of the deadly Kabul airport bombing. He glanced at it — and, according to The New York Times, replied: “I don’t care.”

That is one of the most striking revelations in a New York Times investigation into the campaign against Gen. Christopher Donahue, one of the U.S. Army’s most experienced combat commanders.

According to the Times, Hegseth believed Donald Trump wanted someone held accountable for the disastrous 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan and the suicide bombing at Kabul airport that killed 13 American service members.

Donahue was a senior commander at the airport, but his paratroopers were not responsible for security at Abbey Gate when the bomber struck. Marines were manning the gate. In other words, Donahue appears to have become a convenient target — partly because he was the general in one of the defining images of America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The famous night-vision photograph shows Donahue boarding the final U.S. military flight out of Kabul, making him the last American soldier to leave Afghanistan. Hegseth reportedly became fixated on the image and repeatedly referred to it as a “selfie.” It wasn’t. The photograph was taken by an Army photographer. Donahue did not take it and did not distribute it.

Hegseth’s then-chief of staff, Joe Kasper, reportedly tried to correct the record. On the way to the White House, Kasper handed Hegseth a card laying out several basic facts: the photograph was not a selfie, Donahue had not distributed it, and Donahue’s troops were not responsible for Abbey Gate when the bombing occurred.

According to the Times, Hegseth briefly looked at the card, handed it back and said: “I don’t care.”

Donahue’s military record makes the episode even more extraordinary. He served for roughly three decades, completed more than 20 combat deployments, commanded Delta Force and later helped develop new approaches to drone warfare after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. His supporters reportedly regarded him as a generational military talent.

Yet the more senior officers and lawmakers tried to defend him, the more determined Hegseth allegedly became. An effort to arrange a meeting between Donahue and Vice President JD Vance was reportedly derailed after Hegseth learned about it. Senators were later told that lobbying on Donahue’s behalf was only hardening Hegseth’s position.

On August 27, Donahue retired from the Army.

The contrast is remarkable. When a congressman previously suggested that troops deployed to Los Angeles had not been properly cared for, Hegseth indignantly declared: “No one in senior leadership cares more about troops than this secretary.”

But when his own chief of staff reportedly placed evidence in front of him showing that a distinguished combat commander was not responsible for the security failure Hegseth associated him with — and that the supposed “selfie” he had fixated on wasn’t even a selfie — Hegseth apparently did not ask for more information.

He did not reconsider. He did not ask whether he might be scapegoating the wrong man. According to The New York Times, he simply handed the card back: “I don’t care.”

Those three words say more about the episode than any congressional testimony ever could.

[Рустем Адагамов @adagamov]

🇺🇸 В колонке для The Washington Post бывший глава Google Эрик Шмидт, неоднократно бывавший в Украине и участвовавший в работе над военными технологиями, пишет, что после последней поездки впервые с начала полномасштабного вторжения уехал настолько встревоженным. По его оценке, Россия научилась воевать значительно эффективнее и постепенно переходит к стратегии тотальной войны, соединяя превосходство в людях и промышленном производстве с быстрым технологическим развитием.

Главным преимуществом Украины долгое время была скорость инноваций: небольшие команды военных, инженеров и оборонных компаний могли за считаные недели разработать новую систему, испытать ее на фронте и усовершенствовать. Российская военная бюрократия за этим не успевала. Теперь, предупреждает Шмидт, это преимущество быстро исчезает. Россия не только массово производит оружие, но и сама научилась быстро адаптироваться: на украинские дроны-перехватчики она ответила более быстрыми реактивными "Шахедами", а теперь создает и собственную спутниковую группировку, способную конкурировать со Starlink.

Поле боя при этом изменилось до неузнаваемости. Командиры находятся глубоко под землей, тысячи беспилотников ведут разведку, доставляют грузы и атакуют людей и технику. По данным, которые приводит Шмидт, около 80% украинских потерь происходит при перемещении военнослужащих между позициями.

Но главной проблемой Украины становится уже не способность изобретать новое оружие, а возможность производить его в достаточном количестве. Один украинский командир рассказал Шмидту, что его подразделение перестало искать новые российские цели: обнаруженных уже больше, чем имеющихся дронов для их поражения. Как пишет Шмидт, отличный беспилотник, произведенный сотнями, — это интересно, но ход войны меняет хороший беспилотник, выпускаемый сотнями тысяч.

Россия тем временем наращивает промышленные мощности для тотальной войны. Украина самостоятельно конкурировать с такими масштабами производства не может. Особенно опасной Шмидт считает предстоящую зиму: Россия уже использует нехватку у Украины средств защиты от баллистических ракет, нанося удары по электростанциям и подстанциям.

Главный вывод Шмидта: Украине недостаточно отдельных партий западного оружия. Запад должен фактически включить украинский ВПК в собственную оборонную промышленность — совместно производить оружие, вкладываться в украинские предприятия и массово поставлять перехватчики, боеприпасы и дальнобойные системы.

"Восхищение украинской стойкостью — не стратегия", — заключает Шмидт. За четыре года Украина выиграла для Запада время "кровью своих солдат и изобретательностью своих инженеров". Одного мужества недостаточно, чтобы защищать города и выиграть войну: Запад должен превратить это время в промышленное превосходство.

[Anton Gerashchenko @Gerashchenko_en]

Putin's aide Patrushev said that the United States can influence Ukraine in peace negotiations, while claiming that Europe does not want peace.

Comment from me:

In reality, the only country that does not want peace is the country that started and continues to wage this war of aggression - Russia.

The only country that must be pressured to stop the war is Russia.

The United States and the EU are Ukraine’s allies.

Just a couple of months ago, there was a sense that Russian elites - business, government and security forces - were beginning to grow disillusioned with Putin, due to his inefficiency and their own sense of insecurity and vulnerability, and would want to remove him from power.

But Putin clearly sensed these sentiments, eased the "repression" against "his own," and created opportunities for new profits as the Russian economy shifted to a war footing, with the redistribution of property and money and a new wave of "nationalization."

As a result, the Russian elite now sees opportunities for new profits, as well as the prospect of sanctions being lifted and new business projects.

Under these conditions, anti-war sentiment among Russia’s ruling elite has receded, and they are ready to continue the war.

[medoyid_ua @LetsArmUKR]

Russians genuinely cannot process that Ukrainian drones hit targets 3000 km away. Their entire defense logic assumes the enemy is as corrupt and incapable as their own rear echelon.

So when a refinery or ammo depot burns deep inside their territory, they invent NATO engineers, secret bases, anything but the obvious: Ukraine built the supply chain, the engines, the guidance, and the will.

That gap Between their propaganda and their burning logistics lies something plain. the cost of running an empire on theft and pretending it counts as industry.

[Prof. Bonk 🇺🇦 Perverse & Unintended Consequences @actfast]

🧵"The drone was not heard. Not noticed."

At 8 AM, Russia's top fighter pilot ran an ad for a box that texts your phone when a drone is coming.

14 hours later, a drone flew 3,000 km into the Arctic and torched Gazprom's flagship gas plant. 1/🧵

[Prof. Bonk 🇺🇦 Perverse & Unintended Consequences @actfast]

A 3,000 km drone flight went unheard for 14 hours. But a post on a soup blog mobilized full state security.

When a regime hunts culinary historians instead of guarding infrastructure, its sky stops belonging to it.

The Full Report: 10/🧵
https://t.co/yqrFe8U7As

[Luiz da Gama Mór @lmor]

@augustodefranco Lembra, eles fizeram isto com o FHC!

[Luiz da Gama Mór @lmor]

@CBNoficial Lá se vai mais uma terceira via…

[WW3finalboss @WW3finalboss]

🇷🇺 SIMONYAN REWRITES RUSSIA’S WAR AS A DIRECT CONFLICT WITH NATO

Margarita Simonyan claims Russia is no longer fighting Ukraine at all, arguing that Moscow supposedly “defeated Ukraine” within the first two or three days of the invasion before the conflict transformed into a war against NATO.

“We are not at war with Ukraine. We defeated Ukraine as such in the first two or three days, when we took Hostomel, when we essentially disarmed Ukraine, destroying its main military forces. And then the war with NATO began. Now there is a war with NATO on the territory of Ukraine.” - Margarita Simonyan 🇷🇺

The framing performs two functions at once: it minimizes Ukraine’s agency while presenting Russia’s inability to end the war quickly as evidence that Moscow is actually fighting the entire Western alliance.

In that narrative, Ukrainian resistance disappears and every Russian setback can be recast as proof of a much larger war.

It is a remarkably convenient explanation for a conflict that, by her own account, Russia supposedly won within days.

[WW3finalboss @WW3finalboss]

🇺🇦🇷🇺 RUSSIA’S “VICTORIES” ON PAPER ARE STARTING TO BREAK ITS OWN ARMY

Moscow can color a town Russian on a map. The problem begins when Ukrainian troops, functioning utilities, pharmacies and grocery stores are still there.

Days after Russia publicly presented another city as effectively taken, a Ukrainian general appeared in the supposedly occupied area without even wearing a helmet, openly mocking the Kremlin’s version of events.

The reaction from Russian pro-war channels was brutal. Mikhail Zvinchuk captured the operational absurdity:

“A strike cannot be called in on a village fictitiously taken by a neural network.”

That is the real danger of falsified battlefield reporting. If headquarters records territory as captured when Russian troops do not actually control it, artillery support, reinforcement, casualty evacuation and operational planning can all be built around a fictional front line.

Frontline Russian channels have directed particular anger at Colonel General Sergei Kuzovlev, who reported Kupyansk captured last November and received the Hero of Russia star. Troops are now reportedly asking why soldiers are still fighting for a city their commanders already declared won.

The same pattern appeared around Vovchansk, where Putin spoke of a “cauldron” containing 2,000 Ukrainian troops. Yet accounts from inside the supposed pocket described functioning shops, mobile service and Ukrainian forces that had apparently not been trapped at all.

The consequences go beyond embarrassment. A 19-year-old Russian Spetsnaz serviceman reportedly described troops being dispatched toward coordinates based on unreliable reports and disappearing. One unit allegedly became so distrustful that personnel were assigned simply to observe whether Russian infantry were actually where commanders claimed.

Even Russian equipment procurement enters the picture: one contractor reportedly sourced helmets from China, ran out of money for body armor and used migrant workers to assemble inadequate protective gear.

Meanwhile, Russian frontline sources acknowledge that Ukraine’s reported 100,000-hryvnia payment for taking a Russian soldier alive creates a strange battlefield incentive. As one Russian channel put it: “When the enemy sees in you a pile of money, it protects you better than any body armor.”

Ukraine, by contrast, is described as increasingly automating dangerous logistics, with ground robots having carried out 25,000 missions.

And the distortion may extend beyond the battlefield. The thread claims Jared Kushner spent three hours meeting Putin’s aide and that a proposed peace map subsequently incorporated Russian General Staff territorial claims — the same claims Russian soldiers themselves are increasingly disputing.

That is the deeper problem for Moscow: falsifying battlefield success may please the political leadership, but eventually the fictional map has to confront real Ukrainian positions.

You can deceive a briefing room. Artillery, logistics and the soldiers on the ground still have to operate in the real world.

[Lew Anno Support#USA#NATO#Ukraine 24/2-22 @anno1540]

Over the past 24 hours, our soldiers have struck eight Russian infrastructure targets that support the war effort. A refinery in the Yamalo-Nenets region was hit, as well as a maritime trading port in Dagestan. Targets in the Moscow, Voronezh, Astrakhan, and Bryansk regions were also struck.

Russia continues its daily terror against Ukraine, and it receives a just response every day.

Thank you to every soldier, and to everyone who ensures our long-range capabilities and accuracy.
https://t.co/5FrdyXnisq

[Olena Rohoza @OlenaRohoza]

Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces 🇺🇦 confirmed on September 9, 2026, a successful strike on key gas-industry facilities in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug — the Novy Urengoy and Purovsky plants.

The success of this operation suggests a high probability of a strike on the main facility of the so-called “Yamal Cross.”

🔹 What happened: Ukrainian drones traveled more than 3,000 kilometers to reach targets in Yamal.

🔹 Significance of the facilities: The plants that were hit are critically important for processing gas condensate in the region.

🔹 What this could mean:

The “Yamal Cross” is a strategic gas-transmission hub in Western Siberia, near the settlement of Pangody in Yamal, where around 17 major trunk gas pipelines intersect.

In commentary and expert discussions, it has been described as a key vulnerable link in Russia’s energy system.

Why is this hub considered critical?

🔹 Supply volumes: A significant share — according to various estimates, as much as 80–85% — of all natural gas produced in Russia passes through this hub.

🔹 Energy system: European Russia depends heavily on gas supplies for heating and electricity generation.

🔹 Industry and the military-industrial complex: Gas and its processed products are used as raw materials by related industries, including the production of fertilizers and components for explosives.

‼️ Possible consequences of a hypothetical strike

Economists and analysts, including those citing assessments by Igor Lipsits, describe the potential shutdown of the hub as a massive systemic crisis:

🔹 Halt in production: An immediate interruption of gas transportation from key fields in Yamal and Western Siberia.

🔹 Energy collapse: Disruptions to electricity and heating in regions dependent on gas-fired generation.

🔹 Fuel and industrial crisis: Shutdowns of enterprises dependent on uninterrupted gas supplies and gas-based raw materials.

‼️ In other words, if Putin does not stop the strikes on essential civilian infrastructure, social infrastructure, and residential areas, Ukraine will destroy the “Yamal Cross.”

[Poder360 @Poder360]

➡️ Manifesto de profissionais: https://t.co/D2EIrC8w4c

[Poder360 @Poder360]

#Brasil 🗣️ Manifestos que pedem urgência ao STF permitem adesão da sociedade

➡️ Empresários, economistas e profissionais liberais lançaram apelos ao Supremo para que resolva o caso Vorcaro-Moraes

⬇️ Leia no Poder360:
https://t.co/H4EWJOtsGb

[WW3finalboss @WW3finalboss]

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 CLINTON SAYS THE WEST HELPED MAKE UKRAINE VULNERABLE — AND CANNOT PRETEND THIS WAR IS SOMEONE ELSE’S PROBLEM

“We forced Ukraine to give up nuclear weapons, cruise missiles, and strategic bombers. We promised to protect Ukraine from Russia. We made Ukraine vulnerable.

So yes, this is our war.” - Bill Clinton 🇺🇸

The argument goes directly to responsibility and credibility: Ukraine surrendered some of the most powerful military capabilities it inherited while receiving assurances about its security.

Clinton’s conclusion is that those decisions created obligations that cannot simply disappear once Russia attacks.

For countries that helped shape Ukraine’s vulnerability, supporting its survival is not charity. In his framing, it is a responsibility created by choices made long before the full-scale invasion.