@MarkEjangu@FGoloobaMutebi And i find it very pretentious that it is referred to as the Tutsi genocide... i think the Hutus were killed in considerable measure. There is also the not so small issue of the mixed bloods
@Vivi_enne_K@MMatama As for brain development, does that in any way have a bearing on the decision making?
Is it any excuse for the 34 year old that turned out unready for child mothering?
Or an anomaly to the 21 year old now 40, that made for a good mother then?
@Vivi_enne_K@MMatama The question you asked, i could not answer it without falling into the abyss of preference. Development knows no gender.
All amount of development or undevelopment affects us equally.
Pray, school me from your angle.
@Vivi_enne_K@MMatama Well, you said something along the lines of men being all up in arms.
Now that you clarify, pray tell what is not socially developed in a 22 year old and in that case, should we not start at revising the legal age?
@FGoloobaMutebi I want an open space in which to debunk this fallacy. A place where we can discuss truthfully.
Yes. There was genocide.
Is it right for us to say ... against the Tutsi?
An army with fewer numbers, Ug support, a less populated tribe, ... get my drift?
They won the war by the way
@UG_BIZ "We have grown soft."
Classification at its simplest is called racism.
One day monkeys will sue us for daying they are monkeys.
Heck now you can not tell a person they are male or female without risking a court case