@WalkingMiracle7@WambuiGlam@lilyally98 Similar to the original point of if you married someone and they became disabled it would be unethical to pack up and go. I believe there is no greater or more repulsive sin than neglecting those who are in your care.
@WalkingMiracle7@WambuiGlam@lilyally98 I’m not the one who made the comparison. I’m showing the flaw in the comparison. My point is that th child having Down syndrome is happenstance and when you intentionally created the child you accepted this possibility and therefore it is your duty to deal with it.
@AntosteIIa@MarsAres_2301@eastgorteau There’s a chance in misunderstanding but it
Sounds like you’re saying that it’s justified because it’s justified. But maybe you’re saying as long as it’s acceptable to kill a fetus then reason doesn’t matter.
@MarsAres_2301@eastgorteau It did happen, in my life. Can we have the conversation now or are you just gonna call me a liar and stick your head in the sand.
@WambuiGlam@lilyally98 Now to do the internal critique switch spouse with child. The argument might be valid but it’s not sound because you cannot choose to be pregnant with a child with Down syndrome.
@WambuiGlam@lilyally98 Happenstance and intentionality are not equal.
Choosing a spouse with a disability is intentional.
Choosing a spouse who becomes disabled is happenstance.
Therefore choosing a spouse with a disability is not equal to a spouse becoming disabled.
@hypeforlalaland I have a physical revulsion if I feel I am not being genuine or if someone is being “fake.” I’m aware it is expected in certain social situations but I just can’t do it. This causes lots of problems with bosses, coworkers, acquaintances in general.
@LocalWhitefish@hourlyeilish The line for what? Killing children? I don’t think anyone should be killing children or “mowing down toddlers”, as you say.
@WambuiGlam@lilyally98 I’m not sure you know what a strawman fallacy is. I could write this argument into a syllogism and show you how an internal critique works.