@TorkWhisler It doesn’t matter where the money comes from. Only the amount left over sticks with the farmers. You have to fix your cost structure first.
@CoachNickerson@coachvint You understand he was spending $10k a year and got $5k a year in return. I don’t need to see the math to know that’s a bad investment.
@FoulkShay@BradyD78@FarminKurty In a competitive industry, they would cut margins to gain market share. They would invest in additional capacity to meet domestic demand further lowering prices. These things aren’t happening. You’re right though. Their actions make business sense when they have no competition
@FoulkShay@BradyD78@FarminKurty Yes I can and your point about the optics is valid. But it’s also perception that 2 or 3 major players control the fertilizer market and their quarterly profits look far better than most farmers right now. Even after the subsidies.
@gwiesefarms We would make more money. If you bought revenue crop insurance and participate in ARC/PLC you are already short the market. Prices dropping would be a good thing.
@Srm67@Hoosier7883@HawkeyeRy I could argue these estimated payments are closer to fact than estimated yields most of the time. Budgets are always maybes and I think so
@BrianMitchem3@efarmerdot Better check that. I said 2024/25 actual stocks to use not the 25/26 projection. Projections are a guess. The actual current stocks to use is very tight (as you confirm here) which is what today’s price should be based on. Real supply vs demand.
@BrianMitchem3@efarmerdot August WASDE showed USA final 2024/2025 ending stocks to use ratio was 8.6%. Lowest since 2021 and 2013. Both years had very high grain prices.