Stated earlier this week I’d take any $BTC movement with a grain of salt.
It’s a big holiday week here in the states. 50%+ of the workforce is on vacation.
This applies to both up/down movement.
Will get a better read next week.
delta + price:
is the wrong way to measure positioning.
all you know is the side on which the aggressor (market) is acting.
focus on: price + delta + open interest
- direction (price)
- side (delta)
- money in/out (open interest)
examples ↓
To Western nations:
You can’t build, or even fix, anything on top of societal disorder.
Take traffic, for example. The most logical solution is public transport. But without order, anyone who can afford a car will avoid it, simply because they don’t feel safe using it.
In El Salvador, we lack a lot of things, but we have achieved societal order.
You, on the other hand, have almost everything, but you're quickly losing your societal order.
You can now predict where things are heading in the near future.
There’s still time to save your nations, but not much.
So @JamesWynnReal sold his final 20M $TITCOIN bags for 380,000 $ . But in hurry bro made 1 mistake..
He sent all funds to account that connected with below accounts. 😂😂
2 days back I predicted that these side wallets too belongs to James holding another bag of 76 Million $MOONPIG tokens. Out of which he emptied 1 bag yesterday causing big dip.
Now if we add all his bags together James is now officially having 14% of the $moonpig supply. As I was saying from day 1 the token is fully farmed by his team .
8BKqquTrXhkciyJXH74PfPUZPkFuBjyEmrRQFc5a93na
2CLyBBbpMtbzBsws8WRGpW9DAdhQVsUWKrh9xKYkz8GU
Follow @DataC58218 for more on chain updates 🙂🙂
$BTC
Aggressive sellers are hitting into decent bid support at 106s, delta remains negative, signaling seller control for now.
Still remain unchanged from my views shared yesterday.
106s key support, below this then 102 comes into play.
Starmer, media again back mass censorship system.
Over the last decade the UK has arrested approximately ten people a day for speech.
Paradoxically, the most visible proponents of censorship in the US and the UK are corporate journalists. These journalists are now often the subject of trenchant criticism online. Once, such figures had a monopoly on mass debate (and its associated advertising revenue).
In the UK, such journalists championed the UK mass censorship system, the Online Safety Act, which erects a pervasive censorship (and surveillance) system.
The firewall has a carve out for UK “registered” establishment news organisations, but individual bloggers, independent reporters, social media users and international media are subject to censorship.
In a Monday editorial published in the Guardian, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, again backed the Act (which passed in October last year), promoting its promise to censor “abuse” directed towards journalists online: