To clarify, the current terminals can support peak download speeds of 400-500 Mbps. The 220 Mbps number is referring to actual in-flight performance given that the satellite to user beams are shared amongst users. For larger commercial planes, we allocate more resources to ensure sufficient bandwidth.
Other providers quote peak speeds as real performance, which is only relevant if you have very few users. @starlink quotes real performance measured via automated network performance tests.
The latest aviation terminal supports two channels, so up to 1 Gbps peak speeds per terminal (the A380 design consists of 3 of these terminals). We will continue to increase peak bandwidth per terminal in future revisions.
Three years since the first flight of Starship, the next generation is here. New ship. New booster. New engines. New pad and new test site. SpaceX engineers are working to solve one of the most difficult engineering challenges in history: developing a fully, rapidly reusable rocket
Pretty cool.
I’m not sure what your goals are, but if you desire 1e14 #/CC plasma density, I have had much better results with simply a half twist antenna, and a capacitive matching network with a very short distance to the antenna.
The goal is to also launch the helicon wave into the downstream section of the cusped field beyond the permanent magnet.
PS: it is not published, but one can achieve 1e16 plasma density at a 1-2 T magnetic field. Kind of insane outside of the fusion world.
Godspeed!
Ah yeah, %GDP is a much better plot.
Holy smokes, yeah the railroads really were crazy. Opened up the Western states for business and living though.
Rockefeller was a ruthless mf, and then separate statement: his empire building and Standard Oil really lucked out on the timing of the railroad expansion.
@elonmusk@Tesla_AI It’s a beauty.
48Vdc input?
Any plans to run inference with more general LLMs? Is there an equivalent tokens/s/W for say a 0.25T model?