50% of the population is female, why do we continuously ignore half of the humans AND implicitly half of potential market share? Women learned to live in a world tailored for men, but imagine we design stuff to accommodate and cater to female needs and wants
@RuxandraTeslo@_alice_evans Econ is based on the wrong assumption that humans are actors who behave rationally. Generally, speculative metaphysical enquiry has been pushed aside in favour of qs that can be answered empirically. Metrics and kpis are not always the answer esp when it comes to humans
@elamadej speculative metaphysical enquiry has been pushed aside in favour of qs that can be answered empirically. metrics and kpis are not always needed. esp when it comes to the human essence
@RuxandraTeslo@McReynoldsJoe I agree with @McReynoldsJoe, the material facts that you are referring to are also a result of the way we look at science and conduct research, which in turn are shaped by the stories we tell ourselves. The infuriating history of medicine in „unwell women“
@RuxandraTeslo 2/2 power acquired through sexuality or appearance is not real, nor sustainable and has a very short half-life, as beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. more here https://t.co/l4XI2VfOPd
@RuxandraTeslo what you are saying is not wrong, but the kimtuation is more complicated; commodifying your looks and complying to the worst of male gaze, even if financially beneficial, does more harm than good to yourself and the female narrative in general 1/2