Chloe May’s lies destroyed lives. Had she succeeded, 3 innocent people could have gone to prison.
Police must recognise false accusers exist.
Her sentence should have matched the seriousness of the crimes she falsely alleged - 3x over!
@FACTukorg
https://t.co/XwTOxLwBZR
Joshua Dunmore and his father Gary Dunmore should be remembered for one thing only: their love and devotion to their family.
Joshua was fighting for the most natural right a parent has; to remain in his 7-year-old child’s life.
He sought a prohibited steps order after his ex-partner planned to move the child from the UK to the US.
The court agreed that Joshua’s actions were in his child’s best interests, and that the child should stay in the UK.
Joshua was once part of the PAPA community, standing with other parents who simply want a fair and meaningful relationship with their children.
But on the very evening that should have brought clarity and stability for that child’s future, tragedy struck.
Joshua and his father Gary were taken from this world in two separate shootings.
A senseless act that shattered a family and stole a loving father and grandfather.
Joshua’s only “crime” was loving his child.
Gary’s only “crime” was standing by his son.
As a result a little child has lost not one, but two pillars of their life.
May Joshua and Gary rest in peace. ❤️♻️
https://t.co/1t9MuU8ELI
I am relieved and delighted that Sandie has been vindicated. NHS Fife behaved abominably towards her. The rest of the judgement that asserts Supreme Court ruling did not make it “inherently unlawful” for a trans female, who is biologically male under the act, to be given permission to use a female changing room at work doesn’t make sense 🤯
@ishopataldi7@can_bullshit Right minded people would find the fact maternal grandmother had prescriptions for benzodiazepines along with the admission mother rewarded the children with medals to be pretty compelling evidence against them.
@DrProudman Hi Charlotte, your info is old….FC now refers to this abuse as alienating behaviours when making findings, key aspects include requiring evidence of alienating behaviour whether direct or indirect, not just reluctance. See practice direction here: https://t.co/cqNBjviDvb
Evidently, Britain’s family court system discriminates against men, and we need to start talking about it.
Thousands of loving fathers are being pushed out of their children’s lives - not because they are unfit, not because they have done anything wrong, but because the system is built on outdated and inaccurate assumptions.
If a relationship breaks down, the default assumption of the family courts is still overwhelmingly that mum is the primary parent and dad is a visitor - someone to be slotted in every other weekend, maybe a Wednesday evening if he’s lucky. I get so many messages about it, from depressed and angry fathers. It's grim.
How is that in the best interests of the child? It’s not. A child needs his/her dad.
Fathers are waiting months to get a hearing, with false allegations wiping a dad out of the child’s life entirely. Contact reduced based on somebody’s word, often from an ex-partner where clearly emotions are running high. Is that fair? I think not.
It costs a FORTUNE. So what, a father can see his son or daughter? Tens of thousands of pounds, fighting for access. I can only imagine what these men are going through. It’s horrific.
The entire system is built on the idea that fathers are less essential.
I passionately disagree. Children need their fathers.
None of this is anti-woman, and of course there are men (as there are women) who should not be in their children’s lives - but the system has massively overcompensated and thousands of decent dads are suffering because of it.
Good fathers are being treated like criminals or inconveniences, often bled financially dry when there is not even proper contact with the child.
The system needs an overhaul. I am pushing for change in Parliament.
Reuben (A Child), Re [2025] EWFC 392 (B) (30 September 2025): Child arrangements application concerning 9-year-old boy, the fourth set of proceedings relating to him. Shared lives with order made, along with s.91(14) order. https://t.co/co6G5xdtxc
@PhilipEvsChels So why is her now adult daughter, who by all accounts is a well educated, strong self assured woman choosing not to reconnect with Haigh?
And btw if you read the judgment Haigh WAS offered contact with her daughter after the findings, rather bafflingly she refused it!