lowflyinghawk

I suppose that proves that the coyote's the antichrist. Come on.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@outbreezyWC Standing 2-3 metres ahead of the mark has always been against the rules.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@HastaLaVista311 @RalphyHeraldSun It's not just Victorians.

The problem is its the old 'squeaky wheel gets the grease'. Woke virtue signallers looking for validation from a noisy minority who do not represent the majority.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@PerriW2345 @marnievinall I would say to you that what occurred on the field had zero effect whatsoever on the LGBT+ community. The issue was created when it was publicised by an AFL determined to virtue signal rather than deal with whatever genuine issue there was.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@lowkeyabby Again, a comment with no context. Anyway, name calling is always a sign that you have run out of anything remotely sensible to say. So it is pointless me engaging further with you.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@lowkeyabby The Board did not justify anything - it put something into context. Something you do not care about, I know.

Also, pubically calling an umpire a cheat is vilification. I do not grade vilification based on gender, race or sexual orientation.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@ella_whish @DavidZita1 @AlexJDonnelly Third parties taking offence should be against the law. In this situation, person A said something to person B, which person B had no issue with. That should have been it. Any offence to the wider community is a reult of the AFL making it a public circus event.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@66mc66 @DavidZita1 Of course it is excessive - assuming any punishment is required.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@ChrisHeHim1 Typical nasty, hateful post from the professional victim class.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@adamofsmeg @ChrisHeHim1 High contact only gets 1 week. If calling someone a name is worthy of the 10 weeks (half a season) the afl sought, high contact should be worthy of years. Why is nobody discussing that?

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@Hayleyyemma @AcousticAri @AFL I suspect that, being indigenous, he has become accustomed to being the victim in every situation - given that is what they are told at every step of the journey.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@KirstiMiller30 If gay men are under-represented, it is because they are not good enough.

Ever heard of Ian Roberts.

It is quite likely players do not reveal that they are gay because they do not want to be turned into circus attractions by the AFL/NRL. Other players generally do not care.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@PerriW2345 @marnievinall All part of the same AFL bullshit. No one would have known anything about it if it had been dealt with properly - ie without the public virtue signalling. Any 'harm' to the communities mention is due to it being publicised. That is 100% the AFL's fault.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@7AFL I didn't hear him use the word faggot, so what's the issue?

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@IncrediblyBozza I am wondering where the free kick was for either or both front on contact or tunnelling?

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@BazNMFC When it is better to punch someone in the head than it is to call them a word that does no damage whatsoever, you know things are bad.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@david_perell This is what public liability does for you. If people took responsibility for what happened to them if they cross the chain fence, rather than suing the council, these things would not happen.

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@VastGG Me. My current box is close to receiving its last rites 💀

[lowflyinghawk @lowflyinghawk1]

@TracyWesterman It would be correct that only white men are hired on merit - because they are the only group of people without the privilege of preference.