Cancer is the cruelest disease, because it appears as part of the host body. The reality, of course, is that it is an insidious invader. The hordes of Muslim invaders welcomed by Democrats into America are a Sharia Law cancer.
And it is spreading like only a cancer can.
What you see democrats doing in California right now is exactly why they won’t pass the SAVE ACT.
And the 4 POS Republican Senators who won’t pass it are lowlife traitors.
So let me get this straight. There was a ballot drop of 24,000 ballots and not ONE was a vote for Spencer Pratt? People, if you still think elections aren't rigged, you truly are a special kind of retarded.
So I guess we're all going to sit here and watch them cheat and steal again in California?
This is what happens when you don't hang them the first time.
John Thune is trying to STOP President Trump's America First agenda.
As the most powerful person in Congress he can do it.
Enough is enough.
Taking another TWO WEEK vacation with everything going on is a huge F YOU to Presidrnt Trump.
Thune needs to be REPLACED.
Now.
Anyone still wondering how we racked up a $40 Trillion deficit?
I'd estimate that between 50% and 100% of the deficit is because of fraud.
We want our fucking money back.
TREASON 🚨
Thune is once again using pro-forma sessions, to block Trump from recess appointments while the Senate Is off this wk
-Reagan (240)
-GWB (171)
-Trump (0)
Thune must be removed
Raise your hand ✋️ if you want 5 Senators to start the process of removing John Thune
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.