@RyanTmYt Agreed. The Android handheld market has absolutely bonkers value currently but they all require decently large amounts of tech literacy and a dozen hours of setup to get really sleek.
@djchrisv I'm shocked the android handhelds haven't become more mainstream. $100 from Anbernic nets a highly capable sleek handheld ready to play everything up to the 3DS/PSP era, including a lot of PS1+PS2. $300+ and you're comfortably emulating switch and many pc games.
@Marleaux_@lior_eth its just not interesting. we are all VERY aware that technology can improve the ability to complete a task. It's not interesting to hop on a jet ski and say I travelled in water 50m faster. Its just utilizing technologies.
@cremieuxrecueil Has much more to do with the typically non-allowed speed suit than it does with being allowed to dope. This shit is such a boring sham
genuinely fuck whoever came up w the dumbass idea to replace THE DICTIONARY BUILT INTO GOOGLE with the ai overview's definitions i hope everything in their life fucking sucks
@NoriiNori1@bandit_koochie@Fenrirtheicewo1 the point is that the person i responded to is framing it as though men are uniquely victims to female antagonism. I'm simply pointing out that this behavior isn't unique- and overwhelmingly most often is directed in the other direction. cope and seethe you fucking loser
@iFearGodNotThem juco is a consistent path for D1 talent with irredeemable hs academics to transfer to the D1 schools they have the talent to compete in. There are a handful of CC's that invest heavily into this and have incredibly well funded and run programs.
@mkratsios47@ENERGY Absolutely embarrassing non scientific slop. Activity and purposefully malicious to the progression of American science for the sake of furthering fascism.
@hamanami14804@Neptune973930@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 A vast majority of cells within your body have unique DNA in the form of mutations and defects. How big a change must the "new" DNA in a zygote have to obtain the value of human life. You must define the exact conditions if this is the hinge of your argument.
@DoctorWreckage@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 oh brother, I just read through the actually study. Good luck finding a single sentence or mention that day after pills are considered in their counts. (Hint: it isnt!). Nothing you said holds any water about its invalidity either. Dumbass [DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6]
@DoctorWreckage@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 My entire reply pointing out all the incorrect things you said and the fact that the entire argument regarding the data ISNT THE POINT and then your response ignores all of that because you want to argue one small semantic detail. Yeah you sure exemplify a good faith argument LOL
@DoctorWreckage@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 of inaccuracy to generally change the magnitude of the final estimated number. ANYWAYS, the whole point is that while u all whined about the number you let his ACTUAL false argument that abortion=murder stand without challenge. He wins by defacto when you let that stand.
@DoctorWreckage@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 There is also significant evidence that abortion rates remain similar pre and post legalization, as well as in differing parts of the world regardless of general accessibility and wealth. On the range of millions over decades, its not significant enough(2/)
@DoctorWreckage@Kneegrowfatigue@marionumber4 The WHO numbers break down to 2% of the global uterus-having population getting an abortion yearly. That seems completely reasonable to me. And obviously rates have gone up in more recent years, which is why i only counted 20 years (the original claim is 40+ years)