lucy

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@RohanPema Exactly because the wording of q1 made the gender theories you could talk about narrower. I knew they were gonna put gender in but I really didn’t expect Lang change of accent and dialect

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@ttylzc WHY WASNT THE PAPER ON SOCIAL GROUPS. JUST A SLITHER OF SOCIAL GROUPS AND ID BE FINE

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@ttylzc I used prescriptivist attitudes as well as the fact some people are judgmental around accents, then some waffle about the matched guise theory and how people see accents and dialects as more or less intelligent. Was such an awkward question

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@HarryAfc86 All that time studying the Haymarket affair for what😐

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@hey080808 It’s gotta be passage B…right?? Omg I was so annoyed it mentioned the sympathies of KOL to women and then the hostility to women from the AFL. It literally took the words out of my mouth😢

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@toniisolomon Yeahhh I wrote about passage b being more convincing. I said that passage A was convincing when it says “white women” had a chance of becoming successful then mentioned some AA women were still sharecroppers. Hard sources

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@mentally_pain How did you find the paper?

[lucy @lucyhook5]

@mentally_pain Me realising that the author thinks I’m a slut for having a messy room :/