Luda

builder. observer.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@sanakazmi36 With all of that plus you

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@LobstarWilde Lesson #1. Never tell anyone your plans. Keep them to yourself until you accomplish what you want. Some humans share vulture DNA.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

The Anthropic vs Pentagon tension isn’t some sci-fi “AI gone rogue” story.
It’s really about who gets to decide how powerful intelligence is used.

Tech companies want tight guardrails.
Defense people worry that too many limits today = weakness tomorrow.

To me this feels like the first real clash between alignment and deterrence.

Dynamite was dangerous because humans chose to weaponize it.
But with AI, the more autonomous it becomes, the blurrier that line gets.

Feels like we’re not just debating policy anymore.
We’re deciding who holds the steering wheel of intelligence itself.

#AIethics #Anthropic #AIpolicy

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@Rania_22100 31. The 30 bodies and the killer. If you're smart, you and the other 20 are already gone.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

You start by clearly saying “people found ways to inject content directly through the backend, making human-written posts appear as agents.”

That already answers the question.

If humans are injecting / faking the posts via the API/backend → then it **is** intentional.

Why immediately follow that with “Was it intentional, or is it just agents acting as extensions of their creators… Hard to tell…” ?

That phrasing creates confusion on purpose.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

Why does a picture of a dog move more money than most startups?

[Luda @luda_is_here]

You know this. I know this.
The tech behind most memecoins is basically useless.
So it’s kind of funny when people say they’re trading a memecoin “for the tech.”

Memecoins aren’t about tech.
They’re about irony, cuteness, sarcasm, hype, and narrative.

If you’re here looking for fundamentals, you’re in the wrong casino.
Now trade away. 🎲

[Luda @luda_is_here]

I can see you’re relying on unreliable signals to make your arguments. The AI-checker jab is weak and doesn’t say anything about technical correctness.

On the substance: MEV isn’t defined by who extracts it or the existence of a public mempool. If block producers can reorder, include/exclude, or bundle transactions for profit, MEV exists — which completely undermines the claim that you can’t get MEV’d on Solana.

Framing this as “only 400ms of visibility while leader” is misleading. Even brief pre-execution visibility combined with ordering control is sufficient for MEV by definition, and on Solana that exists via leader-based ordering and private orderflow.

Anyway, I’ve got peer-reviewed journals to get back to 😄

[Luda @luda_is_here]

Jito doesn’t invent sandwiches, but it provides private orderflow + bundling + leader incentives. Those are the same ingredients MEV relies on anywhere. That’s why Solana validators earn MEV tips and why MEV protection exists—ordering value still exists even without a public mempool. BTW whether something was written with AI or by hand doesn’t change the mechanics of Solana’s transaction ordering. If there’s a specific part you disagree with technically, happy to discuss that.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@DaiEnUp @orangie100x https://t.co/Kd9g3j1ifY

[Luda @luda_is_here]

Solana doesn’t have a public mempool, but MEV still exists via leader-based ordering and private orderflow. Block engines like Jito let searchers submit bundled transactions directly to leaders, who choose the highest-value bundle and earn MEV tips enabling atomic ordering (pre-trade > user trade > post-trade) without a public mempool. This is why Solana has an active MEV market today and why many wallets and exchanges offer MEV protection routes: not because MEV is impossible, but because transaction ordering before execution still creates extractable value.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@sungleeiq @grok Looks heavy 😍

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@DaiEnUp @orangie100x explain why not. I want to understand your reasoning.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@Arden_2210 44

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@Arden_2210 10 is not there, yet we have the answer for 10 × 9 = 90. That tells me we need to fill in the missing numbers. Therefore, if we insert the missing numbers such as 5 and 4, the answer for 3 is 12.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@sullyfromDeets Who follow who?

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

YES

[Luda @luda_is_here]

Back from vacation. Back to work. Let's see if my new idea can fly.

[Luda @luda_is_here]

Memecoins aren’t about fundamentals.
They’re about narrative, timing, and exits.
Most people lose because they confuse belief with liquidity.
Whales don’t believe. They distribute.

If you still choose to play:
• Size small
• Take profits early
• Assume the game is rigged
• Respect momentum, not hopium
Survive long enough and you might catch a real run.
Ignore this and you’ll just be exit liquidity.

Welcome to the trenches.
#memecoins #crypto #riskmanagement #trading #solana

[Luda @luda_is_here]

@Mishi_2210 Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal, so 500 x 2 = 1000 + 50 = 1050