My fellow DARK supporter..
The team is totally wack (unfortunately)
It was obvious when they had to reschedule a simple RHEA announcement 3x. As well as lying about another NEAR announcement that was supposed to follow with the RHEA post.
Dont get me wrong, I like the project and the idea and I’m still holding a bag in DARK, but we need to be realistic and honest - the team is extremely inexperienced and it seems like they either don’t know what they are doing or they just want to extract money. In both cases it’s pretty bearish.
@mccallleo1@DarkSwapApp@Crasskitty This team is one of the worst i've seen in a long time. Being able to crash such a nice project in such a short period of time is quite.. fascinating.
@DarkSwapApp Never seen a team drive a good project into a wall this fast.
Such a pity. Thanks for the journey, and for teaching me how easily a bad team can destroy a good project.
1) The first and only Pons-native token turning trading fees into automatic $PONS rewards and recurring $SPON buybacks & burns.
2)Trades everywhere right now, Fomo, GGMG,Stonk, Axiom, Uniswap no limits anywhere.
3) Pays $PONS every 2h AND automatically buys and burns $SPON every 30 min (unique).
Already burned 2.5%
4) There is only one token on RH chain that does Pons payouts, $COUPONS, trading at 6M$ (ath 11M$) - (no buy backs and burning) but it's not in Pons, its in Uniswap, and cannot be traded normally (check pictures - can only be traded on certain terminals and wallets)
$KNOTS, the reflection token on $STONK, trades at $12M.
$SPON, the only native equivalent on Pons, trades at $160k. And Pons itself is at $660M while Stonk is at $254M so by logic, the RH token should be same or higher.
@spononpons
Just sharing the narrative here and why its so clear to me this has the potential of $5M at the very least.
1) The first and only Pons-native token turning trading fees into automatic $PONS rewards and recurring $SPON buybacks & burns.
2)Trades everywhere right now, Fomo, GGMG,Stonk, Axiom, Uniswap no limits anywhere.
3) Pays $PONS every 2h AND automatically buys and burns $SPON every 30 min (unique).
Already burned 2.5%
4) There is only one token on RH chain that does Pons payouts, $COUPONS, trading at 6M$ (ath 11M$) - (no buy backs and burning) but it's not in Pons, its in Uniswap, and cannot be traded normally (check pictures - can only be traded on certain terminals and wallets)
$KNOTS, the reflection token on $STONK, trades at $12M.
$SPON, the only native equivalent on Pons, trades at $160k. And Pons itself is at $660M while Stonk is at $254M so by logic, the RH token should be same or higher.
1) The first and only Pons-native token turning trading fees into automatic $PONS rewards and recurring $SPON buybacks & burns.
2)Trades everywhere right now, Fomo, GGMG,Stonk, Axiom, Uniswap no limits anywhere.
3) Pays $PONS every 2h AND automatically buys and burns $SPON every 30 min (unique).
Already burned 2.5%
4) There is only one token on RH chain that does Pons payouts, $COUPONS, trading at 6M$ (ath 11M$) - (no buy backs and burning) but it's not in Pons, its in Uniswap, and cannot be traded normally (check pictures - can only be traded on certain terminals and wallets)
$KNOTS, the reflection token on $STONK, trades at $12M.
$SPON, the only native equivalent on Pons, trades at $160k. And Pons itself is at $660M while Stonk is at $254M so by logic, the RH token should be same or higher.
No — it's not a real Chinese news site. It's a fake dressed up as one. Evidence:
Hosting doesn't match its claims. It displays a full set of Chinese press licenses (ICP 辽ICP备09003276号-1, news-service permit etc.), but the domain is registered at GoDaddy through a US privacy proxy (Domains By Proxy, Arizona) and served via Cloudflare from outside China. A genuinely licensed mainland news outlet must be hosted in China with verified ownership — this setup is basically impossible for one. The license numbers are set dressing.
The name is borrowed.
The timing is filthy. The domain's whois record was updated Sep 6, 2026 — the same day as the "马到 poster"