abu Abdul-Aziz

[سعود @zaudzarosh]

Those who sought to destroy the House of Saud have failed.

The House of Saud still stands.

[Faris Al Hammadi @FarisHammadi]

To some of the du‘āt who have now spoken out against Haqiqatjou: may Allah bless and guide you.

You now realize that my brothers and I were right to warn against him years ago; even before his shift toward Rāfiḍī beliefs became apparent.

If you are honest; It is only a matter of time before you also recognize the truth of our warnings concerning Surūriyyah and the Muslim Brotherhood.

All you need to do is study the foundations of Ahl al-Sunnah and compare them with what these groups teach and believe. Both are among the seventy-two deviant sects against which the Prophet ﷺ warned us.

Do not shy away from warning against them as well. Do it sincerely for the sake of Allah, and do not fear the people.

ʿUbayd Allāh ibn al-Ḥasan al-ʿAnbarī said:
“I would rather be a follower in the truth than a leader in falsehood.”

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

Warning Against Darusalam Majlis With Dr. M. Ziyad Tukla.pdf

https://t.co/GDBT4w91O7

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

A Historical and Contemporary Insight into Surooriyyah.

- What defines a Suroori
- Their Founder and History
- Emergence In the UK
- Danger of this group
- Words from great Salafi Imam’s of our time.
- Conclusion

Written by:

Ust Abu Salma Mohamed Aided
(MA Graduate Madinah Islamic University)

Read PDF here
https://t.co/qnVNUldFPv

[Yasar A Rahman @YasarARahman]

Yā Abā Taymiyyah, you are truly a deceptive Mumayyiʿ!

You are someone who has not understood the Manhaj of the Salaf in how to deal with the people of innovation. Rather, you continuously oppose the Manhaj of the Salaf in this regard.

There is a clear distinction between the Salafī scholars you refer to and your corrupt methodology. These scholars are well known for refuting the people of innovation, warning against them, and cautioning against mixing and sitting with them. Furthermore, their interactions with the people of innovation are exceptions, occurring only in specific and limited circumstances. By the mercy of Allāh, these rare interactions have not led them to misguidance. Instead, they have remained firm upon the truth and continue to openly refute deviants, innovators, and misguided groups and sects.

Additionally, these scholars are qualified to assess matters of benefit and harm, as they are people of ijtihād. Their judgments and ijtihād are based upon the methodology of the Salaf and not upon personal desires.

As for you, you sit with, accompany, travel with, eat with, and laugh with the people of innovation. You have even praised and defended them. Mixing with the people of innovation has become a characteristic of your methodology, and your interactions with them have resulted in your deviation from the correct path. Your understanding of benefits and harms is likewise flawed and corrupt, and it is not based upon the Manhaj of the Salaf.

You assume certain matters to be beneficial and assume that the benefits outweigh the harms in particular situations, but these assumptions are baseless and without sound foundation. In fact, your actions have resulted in far more harm than good.

Furthermore, since when have the actions of scholars been considered a proof? The statements and actions of every individual must be examined in light of the Manhaj of the Salaf. If a scholar exercises ijtihād and makes a mistake, he is still rewarded for his effort; however, it is not permissible to follow him in that mistake.

You are treated differently because of the reasons mentioned above.

So fear Allāh and stop misleading and deceiving the innocent youth through these reckless actions.

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

From the many weak excuses and lack of Fiqh to legitimize the false co-operation with Ahlul Bid’a is 👇🏾

“But, Shiekh So And So Sat With So And So" |

Abdurahman ibn Noor
https://t.co/hPPjf8bqBm

[MK 🇸🇦 @MKdawah]

Sheikh Google is now Sheikh AI. Ignorant kids developing apps to take your deen from WHILE ACKNOWELDGING THAT IT MAKES MISTAKES.

If you follow a scholar's wrong fatwa, nothing is upon you.

But if you follow AI fatwa, YOU have wrong yourself and will be accountable by Allah!

[Masjid Daar Al-Hadeeth @daarhadeeth]

⏳ 𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐞𝐰 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 ‘𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐚𝐡 - the greatest day of the year, a day in which Allah frees more of His servants from the Hellfire than on any other day.

There is still time to earn immense reward by supporting the completion of your new masjid. Whether you sponsor one Musallah for £250 or join together with family and friends to sponsor a Family Musallah for £2,500, every contribution brings us closer to completing this project for the sake of Allah.

Come together upon righteousness and taqwa, and seize these blessed hours before they pass. Invest in your akhirah, support the house of Allah, and take advantage of this tremendous opportunity while it remains.

May Allah accept from all those who have donated and make it heavy on their scales of good deeds. Ameen.

🔗 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡: https://t.co/cscBIeS4rF
🔗 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐅𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡: https://t.co/68MtoBOLWT

ا═•═🕌═•═ا
Masjid Daar Al-Hadeeth
96B Lower Clapton Road, Hackney, E5 0QR

[Abu Ammar Al-Baloushi @aaabl107]

This is deception.

Firstly, Shaykh Ibn Baz was known for his softness, kindness, and good opinion of people. He would often give tazkiyah to those who requested it, and many people possess such recommendations, perhaps more than people realise.

Secondly, the Shaykh did not know the unseen. He did not know what an individual might later become or what deviations they may later adopt, such as Takfiri or Khariji tendencies.

Thirdly, many of these Takfiri individuals conceal their true inclinations while in Saudi Arabia, only exposing their corruption after leaving.

Fourthly, there are examples of people who were regarded as far more senior in knowledge than those being mentioned, and who received praise from major scholars, yet later left Islam and became atheist.

So the conclusion is that if a person remained upon the manhaj of Shaykh Ibn Baz and followed the guidance for which he was praised, then citing that tazkiyah would make sense. However, it is not valid to use his tazkiyah while opposing his methodology and beliefs.

[أَبُو إِسْلَامَ السَّلَفِيُّ الْمِصْرِيُّ @Salafization1]

Subhān Allāh, what kind of fiqh saqīm is this?
Does ʿUthmān ibn Farooq seriously think that after over 1400 years of Islām, the Ummah was waiting for him to come along and make this “discovery” that the hadīth says “his brother,” and therefore striking a non-Muslim in the face is somehow free game? As if the scholars of Islām, the fuqahāʾ, the people of ḥadīth, the people of uṣūl never noticed the wording until he magically uncovered it?

The prohibition of striking the face is not restricted only to the Muslim. There are multiple aḥādīth that prohibit striking the face in a general, unrestricted manner! They come with wording that is muṭlaq and ʿāmm, covering whoever is struck, whether Muslim or non-Muslim.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said:

“If one of you fights, let him avoid the face.”

And he (peace be upon him) said:

“If one of you strikes, let him avoid the face.”

And he (peace be upon him) said:

“If one of you strikes, let him avoid the face, for Allāh created Ādam upon His image.”

And he (peace be upon him) said:

“If one of you strikes, let him avoid the face, and let him not say: May Allāh disfigure your face.”

These narrations are all sahih, and are not restricted to “your Muslim brother.” They are general. They establish a broad prohibition against striking the face.

Not only that, but the prohibition even applies to animals!

It is narrated from Jābir that the Prophet (peace be upon him) passed by an animal that had been branded on its face, with smoke coming from its nostrils. The Prophet said:

“May Allāh curse the one who did this. None of you should touch the face or strike it.”

So if even an animal is not to be struck on the face, then how does someone come along and claim that if a human being is a non-Muslim, then his face is suddenly halāl to strike!? Subhān Allāh.

And what does that even mean practically? Are we now saying that any non-Muslim can be punched, slapped, or struck in the face just because of the fact that he is not Muslim?

Can people go around striking random non-Muslims in the street because “the hadīth only said brother”? Is this the kind of foolish logic being spread publicly?

The fuqahāʾ are agreed that the face is generally not to be struck. Consensus has been transmitted by scholars such as al-Qurṭubī, al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Ibn Qudāmah, al-Shawkānī, and others that striking the face is prohibited.

ʿUthmān needs to fear Allāh and know his limits. Not every person with a platform is qualified to speak in every matter. He has been making one blunder after another, spreading odd and outlandish verdicts that many layman may follow. And if people follow these reckless takes, then he must fear that their misguidance and harm will be placed on his scale of bad deeds until he retracts and repents from them.

Fame is a fitna. Ever since he has been increasingly involved with influencers, public figures, and online personalities, he seems to keep compromising or making some of the mindless takes in fiqh and fatāwā.

The religion is taken from the texts collectively, upon the understanding of the salaf, with uṣūl, .. and give me one legitimate scholar that ever preceded you with such a fatwa?

May Allāh guide us and protect the Muslims from speaking about His religion without knowledge.

- Abū Islām al-Salafī al-Misrī

___
@gemshaykhuthman @abu_kutub

[Islamic Spaces - مساحات إسلامية @islamicspaces01]

Being anxious and fearful is of the future is from the shaitan!

- Sh. Abdussalam Ash-Shuway’ir

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

Reflection & Self-Reproach is the first step to a solution.

- Abu Ayisha Abdurahman Noor

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

Debates, Social Media, Innovators & lack of ilm

A well said advice on removing this plague in the Ummah.

Ust Abu Salma Mohamed Aideed
(Ma Graduate Madinah University)

[Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari @WajdiAkkari]

Don't undermine the seriousness of associating and prompting deviants and innovators.
Mufti Menk, Assim AlHakeem and Abu Taymiyah are guilty of watering down Islaam.
Pretending that this is a trivial issue is treacherous and dangerous.
Be careful who you listen to and who you collaborate with.

[سليمان الرحيلي (سليمان بن سليم الله) @solyman24]

@Haqiqatjou كذاب أشر والله ماقلت هذا اسأل الله أن يهديك فإن لم تهتد أن يرديك

[Islamic Spaces - مساحات إسلامية @islamicspaces01]

What is the best righteous deed that will strengthen my Īmān?

- Sh. Sālih Al-Fawzān

[Scholarly Subtitles @Ulama_Subtitles]

🚨 NEW SERIES: "Biography of an Imam"

Episode 1: Introduction

🎙️Shaykh Aziz al-Enezy حفظه الله

[. @Salafguidance]

Abdurrahman Al-Barrak publicly apologising to one of the noble scholars and instructors at Masjid An-Nabawi, Sulayman Ar-Ruhayli.

[Abdulaziz Alhaqqan @Alhaqqan90]

May Allah bless and reward our rulers, those in authority, and those that are spending sleepless nights defending us to sleep in safety by the Will of Allah, and make goodness be carried on their and our hands and push away all evil from them and us, ameen.

[Al-I'tisam bi-Sunnah @AlitisaamSunnah]

The hit and run manhaj of this young chap on social media posts and youtube links.

Lacks the scholastic efforts to write something detailed on what he believes about this momentous work of Sifatu salah and-Nabi of Imam Naasirudeen al-Albaani.

- Imam Ibn Baz’s praise for the book. Words of the previous Mufti of a Hanbali country. رحمه الله

https://t.co/6ou7SbDrjV

“Not to mention how Shaykh Salih al-Luhaydan rahimahullah destroyed the manhaj of these people, but thats never accepted. As soon as Shaykh al-Albani or madhhabs are mentioned, its swallowed like gullibles!

* This book has been praised by numerous scholars and taught by even more around the world.

* This book has been taught in the haramayn numerous times, a great honour.

* its prints and editions run in double digits.

* One of the most translated prayer books around the world

* Geo-political researchers (on Salafiam) independently concluded this book shifted general Muslim populus to adopt Salafiyyah around the globe

* He failed to share the image of the Asal of Sifatus Salah which is in 3 volumes, I doubt very much if he even knows that. One of the most comprehensive, detailed and authorative books written on the details of the prayer.

* The book is disliked since Shaykh al-Albani first dismantled madhhab fantasy and fanaticism in the muqaddimah and then refuted popular madhhab views in the book, especially placing the hands on the chest, feet to feet and so on

* And then the same country, KSA awarded Shaykh al-Albani with an award for his service to hadith, King Faisal Prize in Islamic Studies 1999 Laureate

Topic: "Contributions to the Study, Verification and Authentication of the Hadith"

https://t.co/YtFbaykDNu

https://t.co/xzv3EeeOzP.

No shame so do as you wish

May Allah have mercy of Shaykh Muhammad Nasir ud Din al-Albani rahimahullah and everyone should make dua for him in this blessed month”

Ustaadh Abu Khuzaima Ansaari

———
“Characteristic of this chap, really. Its important to note that this was a fatwa given by the Shaykh to his students. He would have know their level, what they were studying and at what stage. It may have been the case it just wasnt the time or they werent ready for the shaykhs approach.

This differs from the shaykhs advice generally about gaining knowledge and benefitting from shaykh al albanis works generally and as sifah specifically.
The issue with this is that it reads to the masses as "(even ) Shaykh Luhaydan said sifat us salah isnt worth reading - better to blindly follow a mathhab" which isnt what he said”

Ustaadh Aqeel al-Hindi