@telegraph_sport He really does not have “just four days”. He is contracted to the end of 2027 and can recommence negotiations from November this year like everyone else in his situation.
In top-level football (primarily referring to penalty kicks in professional matches like the Premier League or Champions League), the typical breakdown is roughly:
• Scored (goals): 78–82%
• Saved (by the goalkeeper, on target but stopped): 12–17%
• Missed (off target, wide, over the bar, or hitting the post/crossbar): 4–6%
@telegraph_sport In top-level football (primarily referring to penalty kicks in professional matches like the Premier League or Champions League), the typical breakdown of penalties is roughly:
• Scored: 78–82%
• Saved: 12–17%
• Missed: 4–6%
The keeper was not the problem.
@Glinner@fluffygirlpaws Spot on. So the person insisting the average person has “no fucking idea” what being trans means also wants us to believe a man can understand what it is to be a woman? Make it make sense.
A monoculture is what ever you define as Australia’s culture.
You cannot have an Australian culture that is not a monoculture.
A successful monoculture can—and should—be welcoming to people from all backgrounds and include parts of many cultures.
The alternative is that we accept various monocultures that do not embrace the Australian culture.
What a ridiculous argument.
We need to keep spending $367 million every single year on SBS just so we can watch every World Cup game for “free”?
The rights only cost SBS $30 million (they outbid Nine for them).
Sure, commercial networks might put some games behind paywalls or skip the obscure ones — but here’s the simple alternative: the government could just pay $30 million once every 4 years to a free-to-air broadcaster to show the whole tournament for free.
That saves taxpayers around $1.5 billion over those 4 years. Why are we funding the entire bloated operation again?