📌 A real world example of what happens when you "let AI do it all".
A CMO implemented an “Agentic SEO solution”. Then finds out it's hallucinated and either deleted or replaced all their page titles with the page URL and used incorrect canonicalisation.
The result = lost they 80% of their top 3 search rankings.
I keep seeing -> BREAKING: Claud can now do $10,000/month SEO (for free).
Here's why it's all BS:
None of these "prompt bros" share results or case studies.
They don't exist.
It's all just clickbait. Here's why:
I've been doing SEO full-time since 2013.
12 years of actual campaigns, actual clients, actual results.
And every few weeks, the same recycled post goes viral:
"Businesses quietly going all-in on AI + SEO will save a ton of money."
"This feels like buying Bitcoin at $100".
No. It doesn't.
Because Bitcoin didn't require you to understand search intent, site architecture, crawl budgets, or why Google just tanked your rankings overnight.
Here's what these posts always do:
They list a stack of free or cheap tools.
Claude: $20/month. WordPress: cheap. Canva: free. GSC: free.
"Total cost: under $100/month."
Then they say "people used to pay agencies $1k-$3k for this."
As if SEO was just publishing pages.
That's like saying a gym membership replaces a physio because they both involve exercise.
The tool isn't the skill. It never was.
Here's what AI actually can't do:
It can't decide which of 200 technical issues to fix first based on commercial impact.
It can't interpret your competitors' strategy and reverse-engineer what's actually working.
It can't sit in a client call and translate data into a decision.
It can produce. It can prioritise. It just can't do either without a decent chance of making fatal mistakes.
And producing more content / implementing more changes faster without experience or strategic oversight is just building a bigger mess, quicker.
Can AI help with strategy + speed up execution? Absolutely.
I use it every day.
It's brilliant for drafts, outlines, and scaling content workflows, analysing data, identifying patterns.
With expert direction and course corrections.
It's a power tool, not a tradesperson.
You still need someone who knows where to cut.
The "prompt bro" posts get engagement because they sell a fantasy.
The fantasy that expertise is now obsolete.
That 12 years of pattern recognition can be replaced by a $20 subscription.
It can't.
The businesses winning with AI right now aren't replacing expertise.
They're combining it with execution speed.
That's the actual edge.
What's your take on it all?
-> Is AI replacing SEO skill, or amplifying it?
📢 #SEO alert! G's new 'Filter By' feature is 🫨ing up product searches. Here's a quick SEO hitlist:
ℹ️ SD is your friend. Optimise it on prdct + ctgry pages.
📝 Dtld descriptions win. e.g. w+h, materials, etc
🔥 Want the full scoop? https://t.co/a4ayrPO6Hc
Follow along as we do a real-time prelim SEO audit of the Sleeping Duck Indestruct Bed landing page! ⏱️ 🦆💤
Saw something we missed? Want us to review another website? We'd love to hear it in the comments!
#SEO#seoaudit#sleepingduck
https://t.co/BFwwclyfN8
PSA - in a business context, "I'd like to pick your brains" 99% of the time is code for "I'd like to waste your time". It's in my nature to be helpful, but I wouldn't say I like being taken advantage of. What's your go-to response to this all-too-common question?