@Saktha7@Ahab59_ So, Hinduism after 2014 is abrahamic?
Wow! Thanks for admitting that you don't actually care about your faith, and it is all about political gain.
@Saktha7@Ahab59_ The term Hindu and the concept of Hinduism as an organised proselytizing religion are not mentioned or prescribed in any of the religious texts.
You hate abrahamic religions to the extent that you want to be one!!!
@Saktha7@LayzyCrazy@Ahab59_ No country has been communist. There were socialist states led by communist parties. The USSR protected from the US nuking us. China lifted ~800 million out of poverty. Cuba exports doctors worldwide. India’s defence and industrial base benefited massively from Soviet support.
@LayzyCrazy@Ahab59_ Yet, under left rule, WB never saw communal riots. Around 56% of the total beneficiaries of land redistribution in WB were dalits and adivasis. Dalits and adivasis also comprised over 41% of the registered sharecroppers. It's an injustice to say they did nothing.
@LayzyCrazy@Ahab59_ Multiple reasons.The idea that WB was flourishing before the Left is fiction. Per capita foodgrain production had been declining for 50 years. Deindustrialisation gutted the state from the late 1960s. The Green Revolution skipped WB. Operation Barga was a response to that crisis.
@Ahab59_ The critical literacy of the people you usually engage with must be absolutely deranged if you think these basic-ass sentences I wrote came from an AI. And generative AI is so meh anyway. If it were ChatGPT, it’d probably be worse.
Łapiecie się idioci na 100 letnią propagandę. To oczywiste że pasożytowali w przekazie na masywnym wtedy ruchu robotniczym. Prawdziwych socjalistów i komunistów NSDAP aresztowało i mordowało.
@Ahab59_ And I am sending this here.
Simple yes/no: do you still stand by “popularize Lakshmi festivities is the best way to sanghify Kerala”?
If yes, my objection stands: that’s political instrumentalisation of a deity.
If no, retract it. Everything else is goalpost-moving.
@Ahab59_ Your triad collapses on record.Communist-led land reform and public provisioning are why living standards are high. Religious rights were won by confronting caste exclusion, not by absorbing Dalits into 'Sanskritic high culture' which historically meant caste-ranked assimilation.
@BharataPutran Hindutva isn’t ‘the essence of being Hindu.’ That’s its PR line. It’s a political ideology. And a festival isn’t inherently Hindutva. Bt ‘popularise ... sanghify Kerala’ is Hindutva using a festival. You can’t say ‘festival ≠ Hindutva’ and defend a plan to use it for Hindutva.
This is why we say Hindutva is not Hinduism. They want to popularise festivities related to a goddess not because of faith or worship but to gain political momentum.
@BharataPutran You’re denying a claim I never made. I said Hindutva is not Hinduism. You just said the same. The only person treating a Hindu festival as a Hindutva tool is the one proposing ‘sanghification.’ Read before you rage.
@Ahab59_ You are not refuting me; you are confessing. You’re not saying religion has social functions. You’re saying those functions are why you want the festival. That’s not faith. That’s infrastructure-building for an ideology—with a deity as the billboard.