Sam Altman at Stanford, earlier this year: OpenAI's next hire is an AI
"We set this goal that by September of this year we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs as an AI research intern"
What he laid out in the class:
→ Codex got really good early this year, and 5.5 was the real inflection point
→ today's pipeline is pre-training, mid-training, post-training and RL, and he expects a major rewrite
→ finding a better pipeline is "a research problem for the AIs to figure out"
→ by March 2028 the goal is a full end-to-end, very talented AI researcher inventing new architectures
AI intern → AI researcher → AI designs the next AI
His bet: with the current pipeline, AI gets over the line where it does incredible work
What would you hand an AI research intern first?
Geoffrey Hinton opened his lecture with: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture"
Then he explained why digital minds will out-learn us:
→ people share around 100 bits per sentence, even at the maximum rate
→ copies of the same model share what they learn by averaging their weights, trillions of bits at a time
→ that's how big models are trained: many copies, different data, one shared update
→ he calls them millions or billions of times better than us at sharing
10,000 copies → 10,000 different courses → every copy knows every course
"It's kind of scary"
If your copies could learn everything you learn, what would you study first?
Sam Altman at Stanford, earlier this year: OpenAI's next hire is an AI
"We set this goal that by September of this year we will use 500,000 A100 equivalent GPUs as an AI research intern"
What he laid out in the class:
→ Codex got really good early this year, and 5.5 was the real inflection point
→ today's pipeline is pre-training, mid-training, post-training and RL, and he expects a major rewrite
→ finding a better pipeline is "a research problem for the AIs to figure out"
→ by March 2028 the goal is a full end-to-end, very talented AI researcher inventing new architectures
AI intern → AI researcher → AI designs the next AI
His bet: with the current pipeline, AI gets over the line where it does incredible work
What would you hand an AI research intern first?
Lovable's CTO on the scale behind vibe-coded apps
"We've created 70 million applications on Lovable"
Fabian Hedin's numbers from his Cloudflare Connect talk:
→ 70 million apps created since launch
→ about 1 million new apps every week
→ over 1 billion visits to those apps every month
→ about 7 billion requests a day to the Cloudflare Workers behind them
70M apps → can't keep a server live for each → spin up compute only when someone visits
That's the real engineering problem of AI app builders: not generating the app, but serving millions of them on demand
Would you build your next product on a platform hosting 70 million others?
Cursor engineer Lauren Tan on why most people can't scale agents
"You can't spawn a hundred agents when you don't even trust the output of one agent"
In her talk she walks through the trust curve:
→ at first you watch every single output and can't parallelize
→ over five months she built enough trust to let her agents auto-merge PRs
→ she woke up to 20 PRs already landed on main, and they were good
→ last month she shipped 1,000 PRs, this month she was near 800 by the 12th
Watch every output → build trust → let agents merge → scale
Her point: set your agents up well and you can get to a similar level
How many agents do you actually trust today?
Demis Hassabis on the hardest part of building DeepMind
"You want to be five years ahead of your time, not 50"
In his Cambridge lecture he admits the first years were a wall:
→ for the first couple of years nothing worked
→ they couldn't score a single point in Pong, the simplest game there is
→ they wondered if they were 10 or 20 years too early, like Babbage
→ then it converged, and that gave them the confidence for harder problems
Early → painful → working → bigger bets
Being early is a strategy. Being 50 years early is just pain
How long would you keep building before the first point lands?
Demis Hassabis on the hardest part of building DeepMind
"You want to be five years ahead of your time, not 50"
In his Cambridge lecture he admits the first years were a wall:
→ for the first couple of years nothing worked
→ they couldn't score a single point in Pong, the simplest game there is
→ they wondered if they were 10 or 20 years too early, like Babbage
→ then it converged, and that gave them the confidence for harder problems
Early → painful → working → bigger bets
Being early is a strategy. Being 50 years early is just pain
How long would you keep building before the first point lands?