@HLC_actual@jhseeman1 You could legit do that turning just normally, or while holding an EBR... man those things could be hazardous to your health if Mrs. HLC didn't like swinging from them like Jane of the Jungle... I absolutely love you man!
Justice Thomas is correct.
"The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President’s Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens. In doing so, the Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support. Because many potential applications of the President’s Order are consistent with the original public meaning of the Citizen-ship Clause, I respectfully dissent." -Justice Thomas
#SCOTUS #invasion #war #islam #3rdWorld #citizenship
@HLC_actual I never mentioned the size of HLC's meat hammer (as you so eloquently put it). Im positive, however, His is much larger than the Karens' next door. The first to flop their dick on the table tends to win the argument, regardless of size.
Flop that dick on the table HLC. Be confident knowing you can still choke them out with the Ball-sac of Justice.
In all seriousness, if you don't stand firm immediately, you will be forever fucked with. Theyre trying to measure dicks. Just let them know Mrs. HLC's is also bigger.
One thing you need to understand about senior generals is that many of them are effectively socialist.
Think about it. They don’t have the market discipline to require them to be productive. What they produce is pleasing their senior officers, therefore, rising in rank. There’s no bottom line because they have an endless supply of money. Do you think any corporation would keep CEOs who didn’t win a war for 30 years? But look at the Pentagon. Look at the generals who are complaining. That’s them.
Now, reserve generals are a little different because they actually have to operate in the real world as civilians. I had generals who were corporate CEOs. And they were awesome. Still, if you are a senior general, you have spent 30 years in a government command environment. When you don’t like something, you give a command to change it. That’s how they think problems get solved. They don’t understand capitalism or entrepreneurialism – it’s against everything they’ve ever worked for. They want a rigid hierarchy with themselves at the top, making all the decisions. That’s why they’re inevitably for Democrats and such policies as gun control.
They also protect the club. And that means rejecting any kind of accountability. You can do that when you’re in a rigid hierarchy. Why do you think no one ever got fired for the Kabul disaster? And why do you think they are so very upset that Pete Hegseth is picking his generals under his own criteria and not theirs?
You have no idea how it grates upon them that a major is their boss. The last thing they’ll do is look in the mirror and ask why. That’s because they never had to look in the mirror to ask why before now.
Some of them can actually fight – certainly not all of them, as the disasters of the last 30 years have shown – but on any other subject, their views are not only wrong, but actively wrong. They have a child’s view of politics and civilian life. They want to govern by tantrum. But here’s their problem – we civilians are not in their chain of command.
I asked the SNAP policy director at the Food Research and Action Council if it's a good use of tax dollars for food stamps to pay for sugary sodas.
She refused to answer.
I then asked her if it's a conflict of interest for her organization to be funded by companies like General Mills that profit off of food stamps.