WTB LFS 🇵🇭
hi, I'm looking for an artist who can create an illustration in a style similar to this. If you're available for commissions, please comment below with your rates and samples. Thank you! 💗
preferably local artist po
#artcommission#commissionㅤ
2 a.m rant kz why not coconut
yung mga random au na nakikita mo sa tiktok, halatang naka-ai yung iba 🥹 so sad lang kasi writing a story is supposed to be a freeing feeling. Okay lang if may mali sa grammar mo kasi someone can correct you, pero if buong story naka-ai na? 🤷🏻♀️
We MUST ensure that no Cayetanos, Villars, Padillas, Marcoletas, Marcoses, and Legardas will win in the 2028 elections.
We have seen firsthand how political dynasties stunt our political development, deprive us of any meaningful change.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. HINDI NA PWEDE ‘TO.
Kung tatlong beses ka nang nakulong dahil sa plunder sa magkakaibang administrasyon, hindi pamumulitika ang tawag diyan.
KAWATAN KA TALAGA, JINGGOY ESTRADA.
Dalawang beses ka na nakalaya, sana gumawa ka na ng tama kaso nagnakaw ka pa ring kupal ka. Dasurb.
‘BINABA NILA NANG BINABA ‘YUNG STANDARD’
Binatikos ni dating senador Antonio Trillanes IV ang aniya’y Duterte senators dahil sa pagbalahura at pagbaba umano ng pamantayan sa institusyon.
"Noong pumasok sila diyan simula noong 2019, ganoon na. Pababa na nang pababa 'yung standard," saad ng dating senador sa programang "Sa Totoo Lang" ng One PH.
Hindi rin daw tumupad sa campaign promises ang mga naturang senador.
"Kumbaga, lokohan eh. Kaya ngayon, nandiyan sila sa Senado. What do you expect from them? Talagang puro fake news, puro panloloko," dagdag niya.
A CHEAP SHOT
Sen. Marcoleta’s attack on Sen. Risa Hontiveros that she did not know the rules because she is not a lawyer is a cheap shot, an argument from arrogance and credentialism at its worst.
One need not be a lawyer to recognize a legal issue. One need not be a doctor to recognize when a person has fever. And one need not be an engineer to recognize a bridge collapsing.
Sen. Risa Hontiveros may not be a lawyer but dismissing her argument on that basis is an attack on her credentials, not a defense of substance.
In public debate, the question is not who speaks. The question is whether what is being said is true.
If Senator Marcoleta disagreed with Senator Hontiveros, then he should answer her arguments, not her profession.
In the end, the irony was impossible to miss. Sen. Marcoleta was defeated by Sen. Sotto, a non-lawyer but knew the rules better.
That is the problem with credentialism. It confuses titles for wisdom and professions for truth.
PLS LANG! Grabe yung tigas ng mukha nila to do these things MAY CAMERA NA NAKATUTOK SA MGA YAN HA
pls if totoo ang karma, pakitaan mo naman yang mga yan punyemas
This is how you destroy an institution.
In plain sight, these senators are bending their own rules to protect their political interests.
TANGINA GUMISING TAYO SA 2028 ELECTIONS. DI PWEDENG GANITO LAGIIIIII
ang galing sa part na while nag walk out na yung minority bloc naiwan si minority leader tito sotto para isure ball na hindi matutuloy at makakaboto ang majority bloc.
ang coordinated lang and ang iconic nitong minority ✨walk out✨ 👏🏼
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE SENATE MINORITY WALKOUT
We strongly condemn what appears to be an attempt to rush a major change in the Senate Rules, especially when several members of the minority still wanted to speak and raise serious questions on the floor.
Bakit kailangang madaliin? Bakit kailangang pigilan ang mga gustong magsalita? Bakit kailangang i-divide ang house kung marami pang senador ang nagtatanong tungkol sa proseso?
Minamadali ba ang rule change na ito dahil gusto nilang maka boto si Senator Bato? At ngayong may mga ulat na may mga majority senators na maaaring arestuhin?
We walked out because what happened on the floor looked less like orderly deliberation. The proposed rule change affects how senators may attend sessions, participate in proceedings and exercise their mandate through remote means, and such a measure should be opened to healthy public debate instead of being rushed by the tyranny of the majority.
We have always welcomed healthy discussions on the floor, but this should mean allowing all members to be heard, not forcing the chamber to move at the speed preferred by the majority.
At the time the motion was taken up, there was no duly constituted Committee on Rules and there was not even an elected Majority Leader who could properly guide a rules amendment through the regular process.
How could there have been any action or discussion before the Committee on Rules when no Committee on Rules has been organized to date?
With due respect, the answer that no Senate rule had been violated does not settle the matter, because the rules cannot be treated as a matter of convenience when the very process for amending them is under serious question.
The timing raises a question that the public deserves to hear debated openly. Kaya pinili naming tumayo at iwan ang majority sa plenary. Kaya kami nagdesisyon to question the quorum and call for adjournment.
If the proposal is truly defensible, then let it pass through the proper route.
We owe it to the people who voted for us to do our mandate. This is why we want more time to discuss this further.
Ngayong araw, nagpulong ang Senado bilang isang impeachment court para sa paglilitis kay Vice President Sara Duterte.
Kasabay nito, isinusuot natin ang tungkulin nang may bigat ng pananagutan—hindi para sa kapangyarihan, kundi para sa katotohanan, katarungan, at kapakanan ng sambayanan.
Dalangin natin na gabayan tayo ng Diyos sa paglilitis na ito. Nawa'y manaig ang katotohanan, ebidensya, at konsensya sa bawat pasya at hakbang. Sa Kanyang habag, nawa'y gawin Niya itong simula ng katapatan, pananagutan, at paghilom ng ating bayan.
Sa panahong sinusubok ang ating mga institusyon, tungkulin nating manatiling nakaugat sa tama para sa bayan at sa kinabukasan nito.