Lakshya Pal

I try to do physics| qg and mathematical physics is nice

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri I just went through your account replies holy shit dawg 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you sad as shit kya fayda ghaas khake

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri 🤣🤣 laptop comedy

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri Emphasis on the 'no offence' part (formal), understand the 'no offence' part (imperative)

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri Also incorrect grammatical structure in parantheses

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri Understood, none taken its just a word

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@skdh @rogerzmukiibi The pilot needs to know how it flies and so do the air traffic control and everyone else in aviation 🤣🤣

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@greydesires1 @blublubluberri What part of "on an unrelated note" did you not understand

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@shauncavnar @skdh @politicalmath Yeah then why has she not given a very simple fundamental description then.

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@fundingfumbled @beft_ @fvderop @skdh no what I mean is with humans everything that goes wrong can be pointed to something/someone. If we use something that we don't even understand and an error propagates it'd be very hard to pinpoint where it comes from. Atleast with the models we have rn newer models may be better

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@fundingfumbled @beft_ @fvderop @skdh That is a very flawed implication. First for a technology information to exist someone must understand it AND create it. Technology doesn't exist in vacuum. For everyone else to use it would mean to trust that person. Now replace that person with ai

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@fundingfumbled @beft_ @fvderop @skdh But some human understands it

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@Alpakanya Pagal wagal h kya thodi padh lia hota thoda to ye goo nhi felana pdta idhar

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@RedmondBarry7 They took down th magabots but the real magas still here 😢

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@ThomasVanRiet2 I think there's a significant overlap

[Sam Gregson @Samuel_Gregson]

This populist garbage has infused online physics comms so deeply it’s scary.

On the recent Nobel Prize in physics:

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

The last line in the paper says they set the 2 R S term to 0. But people really enjoy bringing down Academicians because if they don't want to spend time understanding literature it is easier attacking them and proving that they aren't good at what they do

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

It is insane that this anti science wave is going on twitter. Academicians have always made most of their work publically accessible and want discourse, ofc if you come attacking the work with heuristic arguments without understanding it you won't be taken seriously(1/n)

[shannon @mathluvr3000]

afaict the nobel prize winner in chemistry this year had a theoretical model for his experiment that was wrong because he equated x^2+y^2 and (x+y)^2 and the paper still made it past peer review

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

Inshallah blast these maga fools away

[Thomas Van Riet @ThomasVanRiet2]

📢With some actual proper science outreachers incl @Hassaan_PHY @Kaju_Nut @TimHenke9 we are writing up a document that addresses the typical FAQ/criticism from her followers & co-haters.
BTW, this (comedy-style) video exposes her propaganda well https://t.co/oSh9JC1mho

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

@Kaju_Nut Hell yeahhh

[Lakshya Pal @luxx_pal]

If you hate sabine hossenfelder you're my friend without introduction