@DartCharge Finally got through the horrible waiting system on the website only to find no record of the journey I made on Saturday. So it seems like you haven't properly extended the payment period as promised. I've added some pre-payment for my car. Feel free to use this for the journey.
@locationsphotos @smccarron @OldBuzzard59 @StMichaelsHill1@accurascale@hornby@cavalexmodels Well, the Cavalex ones don't Paul as they use a separately moulded part. So the 'cutout' for the wheel is there but it is only visible when you turn the wagon over not on the interior of the hopper. The hoppers are remarkably free of debris on every other trip...
@smccarron@StMichaelsHill1 @OldBuzzard59 Stephen, they are really nice wagons but it was a pity that you didn't get the colour right on the ARC ones. Claim's like 'won't be beaten on accuracy' simply don't wash when we all know that everyone makes mistakes. Perhaps avoid criticism by not making ridiculous claims?
@smccarron @OldBuzzard59 @StMichaelsHill1@accurascale@hornby@cavalexmodels Not nit-picking, just pointing out a couple of 'issues' that will be hard to correct that are not present on the Cavalex version. If it's not possible, how come Cavalex have achieved it? So.... I don't believe your claim about 'won't be beaten on accuracy' I'm afraid Stephen.
@smccarron@StMichaelsHill1 @OldBuzzard59 @accurascale@hornby@cavalexmodels Accurascale's might be cheap, but I'd challenge the assertion that you won't be beaten on accuracy and detail. What's that great big seam line along the inside top rail? That's not there on the prototype. Not to mention the unprototypical 'wheel arches' on the insides. 7/10