BREAKING: FIRST-EVER STUDY LINKS VACCINES TO THE 10,000% RISE IN ALPHA-GAL SYNDROME
We found more than 90% of U.S. children are injected with ~54 mg of alpha-gal-bearing mammalian gelatin through routine childhood vaccines before school entry.
The evidence points to two possible pathways:
1) DIRECT: Vaccines may DIRECTLY promote alpha-gal sensitization.
2) PRIME-BOOST: Vaccines may PRIME the immune system, so a later tick bite BOOSTS the response to clinically relevant alpha-gal IgE levels.
Yet the most obvious experiment has NEVER BEEN DONE: Measure alpha-gal antibodies BEFORE AND AFTER vaccination.
This could help explain why suspected Alpha-Gal Syndrome has exploded by nearly 10,000% since 2013, while only a fraction of people bitten by ticks ever develop the condition.
Alpha-Gal Syndrome has been known for 18 YEARS, yet no scientific paper bothered to investigate whether alpha-gal containing vaccines could be contributing.
With 104 references, our study is one of the most comprehensive papers on Alpha-Gal Syndrome to date, covering its explosive rise, tick biology, vaccine exposures, immune mechanisms, genetic susceptibility, prevention, and treatments.
This major McCullough Foundation–The Wellness Company collaboration brings together researchers across epidemiology, medicine, immunology, and public health to confront one of the biggest unanswered questions in Alpha-Gal Syndrome.
@twc_health@McCulloughFund@P_McCulloughMD @DrHarveyRisc @DrKellyVictory@jathorpmfm@drdrew@PeterGillooly
“Today is a painful day for Pras, for his family, and for everyone who believes in a fair system of justice.”
Minimum security prison in Arizona. AKA a country club.
After the Ghislaine Maxwell dupe, is it reasonable to ask for a DNA test…?
This is Grammy-winning artist Pras Michel shaking hands with Barack Obama in 2012.
This month, he officially reported to prison to begin a 14-year federal sentence after prosecutors proved he helped funnel millions in illegal foreign money into Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign.
The operation: Prosecutors proved Michel accepted more than $100 million from Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho in a covert influence scheme tied to influencing U.S. elections.
The laundering network: Michel used straw donors to secretly route foreign cash into Obama’s 2012 campaign, bypassing federal election laws designed to prevent foreign influence in American elections.
The verdict: A federal jury convicted him on 10 criminal counts, including conspiracy, money laundering, witness tampering, and acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government.
In other words: Barack Obama colluded with a foreign power to illegally influence and rig the 2012 presidential election in his favor.
You have every right to know what your government is doing, and they have no right to know what you are doing.
That is why they are called public servants and we are called private citizens.
Instead, the relationship has been inverted. The state hides behind secrecy, classified files, and redactions while demanding total visibility into your finances, communications, movement, and behavior.
A society where the rulers live in privacy while the population lives under surveillance is the very definition of tyranny.
But if they did this how would the Government acquire all the Farmland by paying Farmers huge government subsidies sell their Land I’m pretend they’re saving the planet from Climate Change?
BREAKING: The Federal Court of Appeal has now twice ruled that the Liberal government unreasonably invoked the Emergencies Act.
In 2022, Cabinet approved extraordinary powers that violated Charter rights without meeting the legal threshold for a national emergency.
Freezing bank accounts and suppressing freedoms to deal with a political protest was wrong and unlawful, yet the Liberals still spent millions in taxpayer dollars fighting Canadians in court.
These decisions were made by Cabinet, and the ministers responsible must be held accountable. Canadians deserve a full apology for the trampling of their Charter rights.
https://t.co/yUmP0c3EvA
𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐒𝐚𝐲 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐀𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐝𝐬 𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐢 𝐔𝐒 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐋𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞.
TORONTO — Canadian media outlets confirmed Tuesday they would not be covering a major foreign government fraud case, citing concerns that the story contained “too many familiar elements” that could confuse audiences or prompt uncomfortable questions closer to home.
According to editorial sources, the decision was made after preliminary reviews revealed patterns involving public funds, weak oversight, and vague accountability—issues editors reportedly felt Canadians were already “sufficiently exposed to.”
“It’s just not helpful to draw parallels right now,” said one senior producer. “Viewers might start asking why these stories feel so recognizable, and that’s not the kind of engagement we’re looking to encourage.”
Media representatives stressed the omission was not about censorship, but about balance. “We’re very committed to investigative journalism,” another editor explained, “as long as the investigation points safely outward.”
At press time, outlets reassured audiences they remain fully committed to holding governments accountable—particularly those with no financial, political, or narrative overlap with Canada.🟥