Mikchan

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

After trying to fight Opus 5 for a week, during which it spent an entire week's worth of tokens and made zero progress on every project I threw at it, I first switched back to 4.8. But then I had a "wait a minute" moment and switched to 4.6, and suddenly my experience became much better, as good as when I first started using Claude, even at medium effort. Turns out people are not overreacting. These models really are evolving backwards. Probably because they are running out of training data and now training them on their own output or something. Honestly, I have no idea

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@rod_mallo Because YOU personally will not follow these instructions

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@jaredwray @npmjs Did you delete your gh account, or did the perpetrator?

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@auren Press "Don't Allow". That's an option

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

Like, even the English language helps you with that. "I have no money." "I don't have money." The difference? No difference. It's the same situation. If you guys speak English, you already have a deep understanding of what it means not to have something (0 times X) and to have none of it (X times 0). This is equivalent to the concept of zero. I point this out because many languages don't have such a concept, and you people are lucky in this regard

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

Many people here use the "I promise you 8 naira and then disappear" analogy, but this analogy is WRONG. It has nothing to do with multiplication.

Here's the correct one. Imagine all naira is split into boxes, each containing 8 naira (what the fuck is a naira, btw? I digress). So you can only get naira in increments of 8. Not 1, not 5, not 7, only 8, 16, 24, and so on.

When someone gives you 0 such boxes, you end up with 0 naira. It's equivalent to not giving you anything at all. It's this simple. I give you zero money, you end up with zero money. I don't understand how so many people here don't have the intuition of not having shit.

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@thefinnmckenty Yeah, I'm not sure about this one

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@Chileemanya @eko_kieran Giving you something 0 times is equivalent to not giving you anything at all. It's as straightforward as it gets

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@ryscottcam @clive_mart1n Genuinely, what exact songs?

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@GeorgeBolyki @iam_zachi I addressed directly what you said. If you're too slow to understand what I mean, that's a skill issue. Your cognitive ability is not my problem

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

Yeah, it's an agreement. You agree to pay up, and they agree to provide the service. It goes both ways. This makes you and Apple business partners, not holy master Apple and dirty-ass plebeian you, who should be grateful for the opportunity to touch the deity's fingernail. Again, if you let them bend you over, that's not doing business. You're simply a cuck. There's no arrogance in asking whether what they do is fair and whether they're properly fulfilling their part of the agreement

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

> entitelement

The guy pays $99 for a developer license and a 30% commission for the service. This is part of what covers Apple's reviewers' salaries. They are paid to do this shit. It's not entitlement, it's called doing business, and Apple cuts corners on their side. This needs to be called out. If not, you're simply a business cuck. It's not "arrogance and entitlement" that gets you nowhere. Letting everyone you do business with bend you over and lube your ass is what gets you nowhere.

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@matthewkheafy I guess the first track to be called "XI"? 😅

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

Not always. That's the way to reach the Releases tab, and you'll always be able to reach that section, sure. But, you know, if it's removed from the home page, there's probably a reason for that. Maybe the author didn't bother to create a releases pipeline, maybe they don't want to, maybe it's not needed, or maybe they are deliberately against it

After all, GitHub isn't a software-sharing platform. It's a source code-sharing platform. The Releases function is just a nice QoL way to add some metadata and files to tags, which are a basic function of git. But you can't force everyone to use it

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@picklerick9173 @ronniedaratman @ZipperArtz No, I mean literally, there's no "bury the Releases button" button. All you can do is uncheck it on the home page. But it's still available through Tags, as it was originally intended

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

There's no way to bury it. People are just hiding it from the main page because, for whatever reason, they don't want it to be accessible from there. It's not a default option, and it's usually done for a reason. It wouldn't be good if they forced everyone to use the same system. But the layout is hard-coded, you can't change it. If that's what you mean by forcing, it's already done.

Also, you don't need to navigate "multiple pages and sublinks." Click "Tags" and then "Releases." Git tags and releases are intertwined on GitHub. If you face this problem constantly, it's easy to memorize once

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@AngeredHippo @basadomente @redaction None of the execs did. Only employees

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

@madeyoulooveme @redaction First

[Mikchan @m1kch4n]

Slave mentality at its finest. See, the question you have to ask is not whether a specific type of cattle feed is safe for you, but since when the government has had the right to decide that your only options are cattle feed and poisonous cattle feed, and who authorized them to make that decision