@cekdrew@ComstockRoyalty $DTREF By "we have a lot of REE's", Trump's talking about known quantities, whether beneath or above the earth's surface. Processing (to him) means refining them AND digging them up.
Btw feel free to reply to @bgreezzz here (lol): https://t.co/CiUMTGQAJh
@cekdrew@NPCA What was the point of this update?
You are 3+ days behind and literally said nothing of substance about the hearing and shared not an ounce of new information.
@bgreezzz@skies_bluebird@DavidSleem65372 Her phrasing sounds neutral to me tbh, but I'm no expert. It sounds like she's explaining a hypothetical to the plaintiff whom she's addressing, not saying "here's what I REALLY want to do" either way.
@squareasswombat@rigatoni33 I'm curious, what is the context behind that highlighted ("transparent") question? For those OOTL 🙂 the more detail the better
@Luckycharm_35@Dateline_DTR FYI: the permit can’t be *revoked*; that’s not even what the lawsuit is about, or what the plaintiff is demanding. They’re trying to nitpick over specific geographic boundaries, and trying to force all sorts of rules and regulations around how the mining proceeds; but not kill it
This is just the start.
Colosseum’s economics provide a strong platform for growth. Combined with our current cash position and ability to access project finance, we are well positioned to pursue rare earths and additional opportunities without unnecessary shareholder dilution.
$DTREF $DTR $ YE1.F
@cekdrew@skies_bluebird@grok Exhibit: he gave up on his latest failed attempt, and is pivoting again without admitting any prior mistakes.
Look, your agenda has been exposed... but how about we do this: if it goes up in the coming weeks, I'm right. If it goes down, you're right. Sound good?
Cheers!
@cekdrew@skies_bluebird@grok I am immune to gaslighting 😮 (sorry). But for passerbys: all that bullet is explaining is "in theory, this highly improbable thing is technically possible".
You are 0/5 now lol.
@cekdrew@skies_bluebird@grok $DTREF Hey ChatGPT-5.4, take your time grokking this slop 😉. In your wet dream in which the court seeks to issue a preliminary injunction, the plaintiff would first have to satisfy the Winter factors, and isn't happening.
You're... 0/4 now, roughly? I can do more if you want
@cekdrew@skies_bluebird $DTREF This is kinda sad lol. 1) You said "Let's stay grounded", but you weren't grounded. 2) You pivoted to "do you know how injunctions work?", but *you* don't know how injunctions work. 3) "oh fuck, time to shitpost". We now know you lack credibility. 😂
@cekdrew $DTREF Sure, let's get grounded:
- Mathematically speaking, it would be extremely improbable for the ground that Colosseum resides on to *not* contain REE's. They've given tons of preliminary data suggesting this. Just logic.
- Burgum disagrees with you.
@cekdrew@skies_bluebird $DTREF You are aware that mining at the Colosseum is *not* currently impeded, right? This was confirmed in their response 4 days ago: https://t.co/Kld9WRfLyS
However long the case is, production is still ongoing. And the BFS (or equivalent response) is within the next 11 days.