Statistically IMPOSSIBLE.
They think Americans won’t see the Massive Fraud they are committing against the American people…
Pratt and Bass vote share pre and post Election Day are the same. Raman’s has doubled. This is statistically impossible.
SO MUCH FRAUD 🤯😡😡
Former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer (passed 2021) didn’t mince words:
“UFOs are REAL. Multiple alien species have visited Earth for thousands of years.”
He named the star systems: Zeta Reticuli, Pleiades, Orion, Andromeda, Altair.
Some are working with the U.S. government, he claimed, sharing tech like microchips, fiber optics, and advanced materials.
Military has shot UFOs down. We’ve back-engineered the crashes.
Most species are friendly, Hellyer said. Stop treating them as enemies. Cooperate instead of building Star Wars-style space weapons.
One of the highest-ranking officials in history to say it out loud.
Friends… or something else?👽
What do you think?👇
They want you to believe this happened in the LA Mayors race…
3rd place jumps to 1st in *every* ballot drop *after* Election Day
Defies all mathematical probability, the law of averages and has never happened in US election history
No one with a functional brain believes this
Yea the math don’t make sense…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
How do you make sense of this math though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
How do you make sense of this man though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
How do you make sense of this math though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
How do you make sense of this math…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
Exactly, I won’t say this prove frauds but it definitely warrants the question to investigate for fraud, and should have bi-partisan support.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.