m

m

[m @m85231483]

@TheRealHawlucha @royaltykim99 @jakepaul This thread is over a year old I don't even remember what the original tweet said 😂😂 If anyone is poking a dead horse, its you, champ x

[m @m85231483]

@tJwek @praxben No answer 😂😂

[m @m85231483]

@tJwek @praxben What's your point exactly?

[m @m85231483]

@Latvala12357896 @Acts17David Vast majority of Muslims accept this as authentic.

[m @m85231483]

@MangoTangosauce @InspiringPhilos This doesn't prove anything he said to be wrong...

[m @m85231483]

@barrybuccs_ @RJB967 @__succession__ @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah That doesn't even make sense, this topic has been a topic of discussion since Church was founded, so the idea that people are leaving Christianity due to the hypostatic union is incompatible with the fact Christianity has become the biggest religion.

[m @m85231483]

@barrybuccs_ @RJB967 @__succession__ @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah They are two distinct natures, under one personhood, you're further proving that you have not researched the hypostatic union. You'd have a point if I was arguing there was only one nature in Christ.

[m @m85231483]

@barrybuccs_ @RJB967 @__succession__ @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah I don't think you even researched what the hypostatic union is, either that or you're pivoting from the topic of Christ's divinity and humanity in one hypostasis to the existence of several hypostasis sharing one divine essence.

Ignorance or pivoting, pick one.

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @Handheld48767 @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah I think you're confusing tu quoque with ad hominem. And I'm going to take your silence on the previous points as a concession as you merely focused on getting ad hom. and tu quoque confused.

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @actual_xian @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah All you've done is misrepresented the argument I presented and tried to argue the same point through misrepresenting my point. You're not very good at this.

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @Handheld48767 @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah But even if it was true, the best you'd have is the Tu quoque logical fallacy.

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @Handheld48767 @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah Nowhere does the state Rebeccah was 3. Actually, the fact she carried a pitcher to a well, had filled up and took it to the camels suggests she is not a 3 year old girl, 3 year old girls could likely not do this.

Heres why you shouldn't use ChatGPT:

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @KianjRyan @node_cathode @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah It's a pure contradiction and logical fallacy to you as you're misrepresenting biblical theology. No one said the 3 hypostasis become 1 hypostasis, and that's where you're getting confused.

[m @m85231483]

@1only1alone @actual_xian @GeorgeBo0bs @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah They're 3 distinct hypostasis whom share the same divine essence. You're conflating the hypostatis and the divine essence when you say "uhh but 1+1+1=3 not 1". Theres no cope, you're just uneducated and thus strawman biblical theology.

[m @m85231483]

@barrybuccs_ @RJB967 @__succession__ @unplugfitX @sovereignbrah If you're going to debate Biblical theology, at least be slightly educated in it.

Start with the hypostatic union.

[m @m85231483]

@geodudism @slongier @TateTheTalisman

[m @m85231483]

@topgunjr006 @Cuppatea78 @mysecretsidexxx @Jenflix01 @WayneGb88 No one said you should be silent, mate. They said you're chatting shit and that many people have expressed the same opinion regarding what you're saying.

[m @m85231483]

@topgunjr006 @mysecretsidexxx @Cuppatea78 @Jenflix01 @WayneGb88 😂😂😂